Originally posted by Sam
View Post
We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory. Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone for whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt. It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him-by then a former president well into his eighties-of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.
https://www.justice.gov/storage/repo...ruary-2024.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/storage/repo...ruary-2024.pdf
So the question is, if the evidence really was lacking, then why not just say so and leave it at that? Why create this additional narrative that Joe is too far gone mentally to stand up to the rigors of a trial?
Comment