Originally posted by Cow Poke
View Post
Originally posted by Cow Poke
View Post
I am reluctant to accept your sweeping comments on the US public education system as necessarily being reliable.
Although as I have previously written there are some serious issues with the present quality of American public education, as US rankings against other countries regularly demonstrates.
In his book Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, Neil Postmen argued that the dumbing down of the USA really took off in the nineteenth century when fewer books were being read as new inventions, photography, the telegraph, and later, cinema took hold.
The gradual slide into general ignorance has often been led from the very top. In the early 1960s a certain B list actor named Ronald Reagan made a radio broadcast that included the following:
we can do without a few freedoms in order to enjoy government by an intellectual elite which obviously knows what is best for us
subsidizing intellectual curiosity
One might opine that Reagan was the first of the more recent US presidents to have a distinctly anti-intellectual bias being neither intellectually curious nor particularly well-read. Indeed, did he read any books at all? One suspects not given some of his crass [and hilarious] comments.
If you do not need to be overly well educated or intellectual to become a House Representative, Senator, or even the POTUS why is it necessary for John and Jane Doe to bother?
And politicians who know as little as they do seem to appeal to large swathes of the US electorate.
Comment