Originally posted by lilpixieofterror
View Post
Sorry Sam, but I know language control and how you control the language by controlling the terms you use. Do you have children? If so, were they babies before they were born or were they fetus? Do women have fetus showers or do they have baby showers? When a women talks about movement during pregnancy, does she say the fetus is moving or the baby is moving? The answer should be pretty obvious, the answer is that the term used is 'baby' and the reason that term is used is the connotations attached to the term. It is always interesting how pro abortionist try to use medical terms such as fetus to refer to the born or non medical terms such as clump of cells or parasite to refer to the unborn. Why do they have such a problem with the term 'baby' Sam? It has nothing to do with medical science (even my doctor, used the term baby). Don't believe me? Here is an article by the Mayo Clinic when they talk about the important of prenatal care:
The article continues to use the term 'baby' and not 'fetus' and it is written by medical professionals. Why is the term 'baby' chosen vs 'fetus'. Quite simple, baby has a different connotation attached to it and thus when we are talking about a wanted 'fetus' we use the term 'baby'. I hate to burst your bubble, but using 'baby' is perfectly valid and is used by medical professionals too. The only time I ever hear the term 'fetus' used is to remove the human connotations and try to attach a non human connotation to what abortion truly is or in school to talk about different stages of animal development.
Sorry Sam, but you're wrong and very wrong at that. See, the personhood argument is just a farce to remove the human element from what you are doing. Interesting enough, all genocidal manics love removing humanity from what they are doing. Jews are non persons and you can do with them what you please. See how easy it is to justify mass murder, by calling what you are doing something else? I know you want to control the language, but I will not let you control the language. Trying to use 'person-hood' argument is your way of hiding the reality of what you are doing; ending the life of a human for the awful crime of daring to exist and trying to hide your crime behind words and phrases.
The article continues to use the term 'baby' and not 'fetus' and it is written by medical professionals. Why is the term 'baby' chosen vs 'fetus'. Quite simple, baby has a different connotation attached to it and thus when we are talking about a wanted 'fetus' we use the term 'baby'. I hate to burst your bubble, but using 'baby' is perfectly valid and is used by medical professionals too. The only time I ever hear the term 'fetus' used is to remove the human connotations and try to attach a non human connotation to what abortion truly is or in school to talk about different stages of animal development.
Sorry Sam, but you're wrong and very wrong at that. See, the personhood argument is just a farce to remove the human element from what you are doing. Interesting enough, all genocidal manics love removing humanity from what they are doing. Jews are non persons and you can do with them what you please. See how easy it is to justify mass murder, by calling what you are doing something else? I know you want to control the language, but I will not let you control the language. Trying to use 'person-hood' argument is your way of hiding the reality of what you are doing; ending the life of a human for the awful crime of daring to exist and trying to hide your crime behind words and phrases.
Comment