Kyle Rittenhouse...

[Sparko]

And I told you that you need to decide only on evidence introduced at the trial. You are not an expert. But you can make a decision as if your were a juror provided you listen to all the evidence.

The things I say are consistent with the trial evidence.

Very strange in my view that Ziminsky was not called to give evidence.

Well going by the trial evidence, the jury found him not guilty.

And the reason ziminsky wasn't called was because he would have incriminated himself and he still has a trial coming up. He would have been a terrible witness for the prosecution.

[Gondwanaland]

And I told you that you need to decide only on evidence introduced at the trial.

The evidence introduced at trial debunks the prosecution. Are you slow?

You are not an expert.

I don't need to be to make a basic observation of how retarded tour claims are.

But you can make a decision as if your were a juror provided you listen to all the evidence.

Son, I can make any decision I dang well please, first of all. Second of all, everything stated was in evidence. Thus why the jury decided as they did.

The things I say are consistent with the trial evidence.

Very strange in my view that Ziminsky was not called to give evidence.

No, they are not consistent with any evidence. As th3 jury decided.

[firstfloor]

I have listened to Kyle interviews on TV. He sounds like a good bloke. One can only wish him well.

[firstfloor]

The evidence introduced at trial debunks the prosecution. Are you slow?
I don't need to be to make a basic observation of how retarded tour claims are.

Son, I can make any decision I dang well please, first of all. Second of all, everything stated was in evidence. Thus why the jury decided as they did.


No, they are not consistent with any evidence. As th3 jury decided.

The prosecution failed to convince the jury. They convinced me. If I was on that jury, Kyle would be facing a retrial.

[Gondwanaland]

The prosecution failed to convince the jury. They convinced me. If I was on that jury, Kyle would be facing a retrial.

That's just because you're a flagrant racist.

[rogue06]

One thing that I've noticed that's different from every other trial of this magnitude that I can think of.

I've yet to hear from or see a juror on TV. By now at least one is announcing they have a book recounting their experience in the works.

[tabibito]

One thing that I've noticed that's different from every other trial of this magnitude that I can think of.

I've yet to hear from or see a juror on TV. By now at least one is announcing they have a book recounting their experience in the works.

And put themselves in the cross-hairs?

[Cow Poke]

Very strange in my view that Ziminsky was not called to give evidence.

Oh, you mean psycho Jump Kick Man?

Joshua Ziminski, 35, of Racine, was charged with arson of property other than a building, a felony, and disorderly conduct-use of a dangerous weapon. His wife Kelly Ziminski, 30, was charged in December with several misdemeanors for her actions at the same time.

The charges filed Tuesday allege the couple were at the protests on Aug. 25. According to the complaint, video on Kelly Ziminski’s phone showed Joshua Ziminski tossing a match into a dumpster and then asking the crowd for lighter fluid to help the fire spread. He then pushed the dumpster into Sheridan Road as police vehicles were moving toward him. Kelly Ziminski is seen on video adding flammable material to the fire, according to the complaint.

The prosecution tried to do their best to hide the fact that they KNEW this guy would have been a dumpster fire [pun intended] on the stand. He would have hurt them worse than their star witness who destroyed their case against Rittenhouse.

The defense was very upset at yet another instance of prosecutorial misconduct because they knew - and HID - the identity of this nutcase.

[firstfloor]

Oh, you mean psycho Jump Kick Man?

Joshua Ziminski, 35, of Racine, was charged with arson of property other than a building, a felony, and disorderly conduct-use of a dangerous weapon. His wife Kelly Ziminski, 30, was charged in December with several misdemeanors for her actions at the same time.

The charges filed Tuesday allege the couple were at the protests on Aug. 25. According to the complaint, video on Kelly Ziminski’s phone showed Joshua Ziminski tossing a match into a dumpster and then asking the crowd for lighter fluid to help the fire spread. He then pushed the dumpster into Sheridan Road as police vehicles were moving toward him. Kelly Ziminski is seen on video adding flammable material to the fire, according to the complaint.

The prosecution tried to do their best to hide the fact that they KNEW this guy would have been a dumpster fire [pun intended] on the stand. He would have hurt them worse than their star witness who destroyed their case against Rittenhouse.

The defense was very upset at yet another instance of prosecutorial misconduct because they knew - and HID - the identity of this nutcase.

Yup, they probably decided that the video was good enough. Certainly a few folks in there were up to no good. I think Kyle went for cover. He should have kept on running.

[Sparko]

Oh, you mean psycho Jump Kick Man?

Joshua Ziminski, 35, of Racine, was charged with arson of property other than a building, a felony, and disorderly conduct-use of a dangerous weapon. His wife Kelly Ziminski, 30, was charged in December with several misdemeanors for her actions at the same time.

The charges filed Tuesday allege the couple were at the protests on Aug. 25. According to the complaint, video on Kelly Ziminski’s phone showed Joshua Ziminski tossing a match into a dumpster and then asking the crowd for lighter fluid to help the fire spread. He then pushed the dumpster into Sheridan Road as police vehicles were moving toward him. Kelly Ziminski is seen on video adding flammable material to the fire, according to the complaint.

The prosecution tried to do their best to hide the fact that they KNEW this guy would have been a dumpster fire [pun intended] on the stand. He would have hurt them worse than their star witness who destroyed their case against Rittenhouse.

The defense was very upset at yet another instance of prosecutorial misconduct because they knew - and HID - the identity of this nutcase.

No Zimininski was the guy who shot a gun off earlier and was going around setting fires with Rosenbaum. Jump Kick man was someone else.

[Cow Poke]

No Zimininski was the guy who shot a gun off earlier and was going around setting fires with Rosenbaum. Jump Kick man was someone else.

Ah, yes..... my bad. But NONE of them were "good guys".

[Ronson]

pursued by an heroically and barking mad, unarmed Rosenbaum

[firstfloor]

Ah, yes..... my bad. But NONE of them were "good guys".

But on the day, Rittenhouse was the only killer among them.; the one with the heavy artillery, a vigilante gangster, thinking he was entitled to take the law into his own hands, going equipped to kill.

Their wrongs do not make him right.

[Ronson]

Very much a bad idea.

Agreed. It would be one thing to meet up with Trump - in private - in a year or so. But not now, and not publicly.

[Cow Poke]

But on the day, Rittenhouse was the only killer among them.; the one with the heavy artillery, a vigilante gangster, thinking he was entitled to take the law into his own hands, going equipped to kill.

Their wrongs do not make him right.

Rittenhouse was the only one charged, tried, and found not guilty. That's what matters.

And only an idiot thinks that an AR-15 is "heavy artillery".

It really says something about your moral character that you do everything in your power to deify looters, rioters and arsonists, and vilify an innocent man.