Originally posted by shunyadragon
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Texas rural Conservative racism - Calvin Beckett in the movie American Violet.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View PostYou did not respond to the Brennan article.
No you did not!
There was no response from the conservative organization to the problem in Hearne, Texas.
No it is not. Please respond to the Brennan Center article.
quite
dodging respond to the Brennan Center article. The OP is not the whole thread.
So, I ask AGAIN, MR. DuckBobWeaver..... what are YOU doing about the problem, besides watching MOVIES about it?The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View PostPlease respond relevant to the subject, and I will respond.
But, I'll tell you what... since you are a habitual and serial DuckBobWeaver, I shouldn't expect you to keep your word, so make your best ONE POINT about the Brennan article, and I will respond AGAIN (unlike you, I can be trusted ) so you can quit the hysteria, and then it can be YOUR turn. (AGAIN)
The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostHow do you KNOW that, just because there wasn't a MOVIE made about it?"The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy
Comment
-
Lookie here.... the Dodger-in-Chief is accusing OTHERS of DODGING!!!!
Originally posted by shunyadragon View PostYou dodged responding to the message (claim?), and 'shoot the messenger.'
Hey DBW.... I responded to your post AGAIN, and you're still DODGING.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Quote Originally Posted by shunyadragon View Post
You dodged responding to the message (claim?), and 'shoot the messenger.'Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostLookie here.... the Dodger-in-Chief is accusing OTHERS of DODGING!!!!
Hey DBW.... I responded to your post AGAIN, and you're still DODGING.
'shoot the messenger' refers to shooting the messenger because he has "bad news"
but in this case, it wasn't that the news was bad, it was just the usual ...I don't care what anybody else believes,
. . . . (I am supposed to care , but nobody's perfect and I never claimed to be sinless)
so, I did not dodge responding to "the claim", I said I didn't have a problem with the claim.
....just because you "shoot a messenger" does not mean its related to the news or the claim or the message or the debate.
.........and please shunya, don't ask the dumb question, "then why did you shoot that messenger"
I mean, really?To say that crony capitalism is not true/free market capitalism, is like saying a grand slam is not true baseball, or like saying scoring a touchdown is not true American football ...Stefan Mykhaylo D
Comment
-
Originally posted by jordanriver View PostI don't think shunyadragon understands how that fallacy works.
'shoot the messenger' refers to shooting the messenger because he has "bad news"
but in this case, it wasn't that the news was bad, it was just the usual ...I don't care what anybody else believes,
. . . . (I am supposed to care , but nobody's perfect and I never claimed to be sinless)
so, I did not dodge responding to "the claim", I said I didn't have a problem with the claim.
....just because you "shoot a messenger" does not mean its related to the news or the claim or the message or the debate.
.........and please shunya, don't ask the dumb question, "then why did you shoot that messenger"
I mean, really?The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostI think Shuny is long on false accusations AND hypocrisy. It's a shame, because I think he's "book smart", but severely lacking in common sense.To say that crony capitalism is not true/free market capitalism, is like saying a grand slam is not true baseball, or like saying scoring a touchdown is not true American football ...Stefan Mykhaylo D
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Epoetker View PostI would probably ban him from any position of influence, on the grounds of having a view of reality that will never go farther than Hollywood does.
Comment
-
-
You're just proving my point.
Epoetker's arguments are wrong because he is a Bad Person, guilty of wrongthink. And how do we know he is a Bad Person? - Just look at the arguments he makes.
Your response to Epoetker is circular, ad hominem, and plain assertion.
IOW, worthless drivel that makes him look more convincing, rather than less....>>> Witty remark or snarky quote of another poster goes here <<<...
Comment
-
Remember, human cults haven't disappeared, they've just infected the world of science, rather than religion, as more people have regarded science as the Final Word rather than any traditional text.
I think Tassman qualifies as a full member of The Equality cult, led by charlatans like Steven Jay Gould and Richard Lewontin:
Originally posted by Steven Jay GouldSay it five times before breakfast tomorrow; more important, understand it as the center of a network of implication:
Originally posted by Steve SailerConsider the evolution of cult-like conspiracies among the rich and powerful from the Bilderbergs to Davos. For the last 60 years, the Bilderbergs have been a secret society of billionaires, hereditary monarchs, and intellectuals who get together periodically in luxury hotels for secret discussions of major trends in world affairs and how they can mold them for the good of people like themselves.
But the covert Bilderberg kind of conspiracy seems so James Bond Era-ish. In contrast, Davos is a post-modern conspiracy based on massive publicity: rich people invite journalists to lecture them and then the journalists write articles about how wonderful and forward thinking and open to important new ideas the rich people are, and everybody posts online their selfies with each other. Lately, even the Bilderbergs have started to publish their invite lists to get in on the publicity.
Similarly, But this rising system of nutty belief is structured the opposite of Scientology, which tries to lure you in first before unloading the esoteric crazy stupid stuff. Transgenderism demands that you assent to the crazy stupid stuff upfront:
Comment
-
Originally posted by MaxVel View PostYou're just proving my point.
Epoetker's arguments are wrong because he is a Bad Person, guilty of wrongthink. And how do we know he is a Bad Person? - Just look at the arguments he makes.
Your response to Epoetker is circular, ad hominem, and plain assertion.
IOW, worthless drivel that makes him look more convincing, rather than less.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Cow Poke, Today, 01:19 PM
|
3 responses
6 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seer
Today, 01:32 PM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, Today, 12:23 PM
|
3 responses
18 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
Today, 12:50 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, Today, 11:46 AM
|
12 responses
42 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cow Poke
Today, 01:19 PM
|
||
Started by seer, Today, 04:37 AM
|
22 responses
83 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Today, 11:35 AM | ||
Started by seanD, Yesterday, 04:10 AM
|
26 responses
146 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Today, 10:09 AM |
Comment