Mueller report will be 'devastating' for the president: Frequent Trump defender

[Charles]

I don't want you to put words in my mouth, Charles. Instead of doubling down on what you've already been told is an incorrect representation of what I posted, you could maybe ask me for clarification. As it happens, I mean that Trump is thin-skinned, and tends to attack those whom he perceives as attacking him.

And you don't find that he could be more focused on facts in his attacks or what exactly was wrong with the statement that:

If the Trump associates that Mueller has continued to knock down were indeed innocent, the President might be spending his time presenting facts to prove the case rather than attacking Mueller and the investigation. And we all know that when you're attacking investigators, you're losing.

?

[One Bad Pig]

And you don't find that he could be more focused on facts in his attacks or what exactly was wrong with the statement that:



?

I'm not defending Trump's actions, Charles - merely disagreeing with your representation of them. The President should be spending his time governing, not attacking people.

[Charles]

I'm not defending Trump's actions, Charles - merely disagreeing with your representation of them.

What exactly do you disagree with?

The President should be spending his time governing, not attacking people.

Yes.

[Mountain Man]

So Mueller seeks no prison time for Flynn. It is going to be interesting to get more details on what he provided.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...7e7_story.html

Eh, based on what was released, there doesn't seem to be anything that would implicate Trump. I know liberals are hyperventilating about Trump's transition team having contact with Russian officials, but that's what transition teams do: they start paving the way for the next administration, establishing relationships and lines of communication with foreign governments, and Trump's team was in contact not only with Russia but with a number of other countries.

[Tassman]

So how did this "conspiracy" morph from "Trump was working with Putin to steal the election" to "Trump was working with Russians to build a hotel during his campaign?"

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/12/04/p...ing/index.html

[Mountain Man]

A number of legal analysts echo Dershowitz's sentiments that Trump is in no legal jeopardy, and now low-info liberals are desperately trying to reconcile that with the slop the liberal media has been feeding them for the past two-years.

Source: Mueller�s Flynn Memo Disappoints Resisters: No Jail Time or Hints of Collusion

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...-of-collusion/

© Copyright Original Source

[oxmixmudd]

A number of legal analysts echo Dershowitz's sentiments that Trump is in no legal jeopardy, and now low-info liberals are desperately trying to reconcile that with the slop the liberal media has been feeding them for the past two-years.

Source: Mueller�s Flynn Memo Disappoints Resisters: No Jail Time or Hints of Collusion

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...-of-collusion/

© Copyright Original Source

I'm officially avoiding commenting until Mueller's full hand has been revealed. It really is a wast of time speculating. It is what it is, and we don't yet know what it is.

Jim

[Cow Poke]

I'm officially avoiding commenting until Mueller's full hand has been revealed. It really is a wast of time speculating. It is what it is, and we don't yet know what it is.

Jim

Yeah

[Mountain Man]

I'm officially avoiding commenting until Mueller's full hand has been revealed. It really is a wast of time speculating. It is what it is, and we don't yet know what it is.

We can look at the case he's developing based on information that has been publicly released draw some reasonable inferences.

[JimL]

I'm officially avoiding commenting until Mueller's full hand has been revealed. It really is a wast of time speculating. It is what it is, and we don't yet know what it is.

Jim

I disagree, we know what it is, we know it's obstruction of justice, we know the Administration was colluding with Russia, that's why the obstruction, and we know that Trump is in it for his own financial benefit and is reaping millions, particularly from the Saudi's, in violation of the emolluments clause. In other words we know that Trump and his family are for sale, and that U.S. security is at risk, not to mention democracy itself. We know all of ("his best people") are being thrown out of office for theft, are being indicted, or are going to prison. The fish rots from the head down. So much for draining the swamp! We also know that if Trump were innocent of all he is being investigated of, he could have cooperated with the investigation instead of running from it and setting up road blocks to it, it would have been over long ago. But Trump has already accidentally, but openly, admitted his guilt when talking to his Russian co-conspirators in the oval office.

[JimL]

We can look at the case he's developing based on information that has been publicly released draw some reasonable inferences.

Yes, we can, and the inference is that Trump and his administration are guilty as sin.

[Mountain Man]

Yes, we can, and the inference is that Trump and his administration are guilty as sin.

Not according to legal analysts. The general conclusion is that Mueller's witch-hunt will inflict political damage at worse if it damages Trump at all.

[JimL]

Not according to legal analysts. The general conclusion is that Mueller's witch-hunt will inflict political damage at worse if it damages Trump at all.

Well, that depends on the political analysts you choose to listen to, and in your case, it's the wrong ones.

[Mountain Man]

Well, that depends on the political analysts you choose to listen to, and in your case, it's the wrong ones.

Because they're not telling you what you want to hear?

[One Bad Pig]

Well, that depends on the political analysts you choose to listen to, and in your case, it's the wrong ones.

Jim, MM said legal analysts, not political analysts. It is not at all improbable that Mueller's report will be politically, but not legally, damaging to Trump. Mueller's case, as has been revealed so far, appears to be entirely built on people having copped to lying about stuff; it's notably difficult to support a legal case with admitted liars.