Trump commits treason

[Sparko]

As is Hillary, who was, of course, named after the great explorer... wait, she lied about that. She was born well after he became famous!

do you mean "well before"?

[Sparko]

Look peoples. Hillary doesn't lie. This is all an effect of the Great Delusion, as the demons hate Hillary and change the things she said in the past to make it look like she is lying.

[One Bad Pig]

Look peoples. Hillary doesn't lie. This is all an effect of the Great Delusion, as the demons hate Hillary and change the things she said in the past to make it look like she is lying.

[Cow Poke]

do you mean "well before"?

Yes, thanks

[JimL]

Look peoples. Hillary doesn't lie. This is all an effect of the Great Delusion, as the demons hate Hillary and change the things she said in the past to make it look like she is lying.

Thats been explained, whether you buy it or not who cares. He who has not sinned, remember. We all lie, and if you deny that you are a liar. No one is concerned about silly white lies that have nothing to do with us, what should be of concern to you is someone that is portraying himself to be one thing in order to get himself elected, when in reality he is just the opposite.Thats the kind of lying Trump does.

[Cow Poke]

Thats been explained, whether you buy it or not who cares. He who has not sinned, remember. We all lie, and if you deny that you are a liar. No one is concerned about silly white lies that have nothing to do with us, what should be of concern to you is someone that is portraying himself to be one thing in order to get himself elected, when in reality he is just the opposite.Thats the kind of lying Trump does.

[Sparko]

Thats been explained, whether you buy it or not who cares. He who has not sinned, remember. We all lie, and if you deny that you are a liar. No one is concerned about silly white lies that have nothing to do with us, what should be of concern to you is someone that is portraying himself to be one thing in order to get himself elected, when in reality he is just the opposite.Thats the kind of lying Trump does.

so lying about sending confidential information in unsecured emails is a "white lie"?

wow, JimL your sycophancy has reached a new low.

[Cow Poke]

so lying about sending confidential information in unsecured emails is a "white lie"?

wow, JimL your sycophancy has reached a new low.

And then lying about what the FBI director said, stating that he supported her version of the lies. Not "little white lies" - big honkin' nekked ones.

[rogue06]

Dude, the Dems had a filibuster-proof supermajority for 4 months not "much of Obama's first term". If you can't even get the basic facts right, what hope is there for the rest of your fiction based rambling analysis?

Dude, competent presidents are known for getting a massive amount of legislation passed in 100 days (which even you should be aware is less than 4 months) while facing a Congress where one if not both Houses are controlled by the opposition (that would mean they're essentially hostile to the president's agenda).

Obama bumbled and fumbled a golden opportunity what with his "lead from behind" philosophy and spending much of his time out on the golf course or working on his NCAA college basketball brackets.

And even when the Democrats didn't have a filibuster-proof super majority in the Senate they still had a 60 to 40 advantage.

Let's face it, the Democrats were in complete and utter control during the first two years. This was why they took such delight in repeatedly smearing the Republicans face's into that fact and for all practical purposes shutting them out of the decision making process. They refused to consider a single proposal brought up by the Republicans during that time because they didn't need Republican cooperation for anything and madde it clear they didn't want their input.

[shunyadragon]

Dude, competent presidents are known for getting a massive amount of legislation passed in 100 days (which even you should be aware is less than 4 months) while facing a Congress where one if not both Houses are controlled by the opposition (that would mean they're essentially hostile to the president's agenda).

Obama bumbled and fumbled a golden opportunity what with his "lead from behind" philosophy and spending much of his time out on the golf course or working on his NCAA college basketball brackets.

And even when the Democrats didn't have a filibuster-proof super majority in the Senate they still had a 60 to 40 advantage.

Let's face it, the Democrats were in complete and utter control during the first two years. This was why they took such delight in repeatedly smearing the Republicans face's into that fact and for all practical purposes shutting them out of the decision making process. They refused to consider a single proposal brought up by the Republicans during that time because they didn't need Republican cooperation for anything and madde it clear they didn't want their input.

Your very much neglecting the problem of the extreme 'Tea Party' and no compromise extreme right block in Congress. The problem is with both parties. The hate and venomous monologue from the right made it extremely difficult to compromise on legislation.

I am also disappointed in Obama's policy of limited and inaction on many issues, but the extreme right and their agenda is far more frightening including a Christian evangelical agenda.

Republicans in recent history have been in the drivers seat several times, and failed to act on important issues like healthcare. I believe the current health care needs to be reformed, but the no compromise right is a barrier. Privatizing the health system would only create a capitalistic profit motive for the costs and not competition, because of the limited number of players in the market.