What do "Feel Good" preachers and "Prosperity" preachers have in common? They're both "deceived."
Both these preachers are promoting "self satisfaction" that will deprive of their fellows of their satisfaction. Surprisingly, a lot of churches are now being moved to "satisfying" their community of believers. But believe it or not, the moral foundation of the members will collapse if the church will subject its goals/works into satisfying the members. In the end, we need knowledge of truth why "self satisfaction" is not the end goal of morality.
But how would one differentiate the "Feel Good" preachers to those preachers who merely preach "Good Promises"? Preachers who merely preach "Good Promises" ends up nothing different to the "Feel Good", nor of the "Prosperity", preachers.
So far, christian apologists are doing fine in defending theism. Yet the atheists are undeterred because Christians fail to step further in just making "Good Promises."
Both these preachers are promoting "self satisfaction" that will deprive of their fellows of their satisfaction. Surprisingly, a lot of churches are now being moved to "satisfying" their community of believers. But believe it or not, the moral foundation of the members will collapse if the church will subject its goals/works into satisfying the members. In the end, we need knowledge of truth why "self satisfaction" is not the end goal of morality.
But how would one differentiate the "Feel Good" preachers to those preachers who merely preach "Good Promises"? Preachers who merely preach "Good Promises" ends up nothing different to the "Feel Good", nor of the "Prosperity", preachers.
So far, christian apologists are doing fine in defending theism. Yet the atheists are undeterred because Christians fail to step further in just making "Good Promises."
Comment