Originally posted by Boxing Pythagoras
View Post
Craig is absolutely wrong, in that claim. Once again, there are a number of past-eternal models which have not been shown to be untenable, as Vilenkin, himself, has told Craig. You seem to enjoy selectively quoting Dr. Vilenkin. When something he has said seems to agree with the claim you are making, you repeat it as if it is an unassailable truth. However, when Vilenkin says something which contradicts your claim, you ignore it entirely.
Comment