Originally posted by seer
View Post
Crep, if ethics are truly relative what is the big deal in how one got there? Why not, to a degree, choose actual pleasure over some relative moral ideal?
Of course I would disagree, the law of God is universal and binding. And all men are accountable to it.
Well they should actually have an argument. Look, math does not exist without minds. Distance for instance would exist between the moon and earth apart from minds, but it takes a mind, or minds, to assign subjective tokens of measurement. But distance is a real physical thing, the math is based on a physical reality, morality is not like that. The ideal that murder is wrong is not a physical thing.
Comment