Announcement

Collapse

Apologetics 301 Guidelines

If you think this is the area where you tell everyone you are sorry for eating their lunch out of the fridge, it probably isn't the place for you


This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.


Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Malevolent Inheritance: Biola Professor on The Fall

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by whag View Post
    God conveniently sends mutineers to the place they could cause the most damage.
    Earth might be considered a place of exile, certainly: and (for a time) Satan rules Earth as its god, with the churches (i.e. the congregations of the faithful) being embassies.
    1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
    .
    ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
    Scripture before Tradition:
    but that won't prevent others from
    taking it upon themselves to deprive you
    of the right to call yourself Christian.

    ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by tabibito View Post

      That "myths" might have anticipated the event does not indicate that the event is a fictional account.

      The sinking of the Titanic, obviously a myth developed from and influenced by the earlier fictional account of the Titan?
      Lasers as weapons, obviously a myth developed from and influenced by the earlier fictional accounts of death rays?
      AI, obviously a myth developed from and influenced by the earlier fictional accounts of thinking robots?
      South Park is reputed to frequently anticipate events that later transpire.

      History is littered with actual events that mimic earlier fictional accounts. Events cannot be dismissed as myth simply because there is an earlier and similar fictional account.
      In this case, it is the record of an actual event which occurred during Logos mission as the messiah; briefly alluded to in Luke 10:18, and recapitulated in Revelation.
      Obviously the moon landings developed from earlier fictional accounts including Jules Verne's From the Earth to the Moon and H. G. Wells' The First Men in the Moon

      I'm always still in trouble again

      "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
      "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
      "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by tabibito View Post

        That "myths" might have anticipated the event does not indicate that the event is a fictional account.
        Myths aren’t conscious so can’t anticipate. If you meant the myths’ originators, you’ll have to clarify how you see this playing out circa 200BCE.

        Originally posted by tabibito View Post
        The sinking of the Titanic, obviously a myth developed from and influenced by the earlier fictional account of the Titan?
        Except we have the boat and countless records. Not parallel.

        Originally posted by tabibito View Post
        Lasers as weapons, obviously a myth developed from and influenced by the earlier fictional accounts of death rays?
        Endless documentation on lasers, preceded by cultures who concentrated the sun’s light with mirrors. Not parallel.

        Originally posted by tabibito View Post
        AI, obviously a myth developed from and influenced by the earlier fictional accounts of thinking robots?
        See above.

        Originally posted by tabibito View Post
        South Park is reputed to frequently anticipate events that later transpire.
        Again, not parallel with cultures seeking to explain the world through imagination and the projection of human drama.

        Originally posted by tabibito View Post
        History is littered with actual events that mimic earlier fictional accounts. Events cannot be dismissed as myth simply because there is an earlier and similar fictional account.
        Don’t confuse dismissal with the reasonable conclusion that myths evolve. You can’t say only one is rooted in ontological, metaphysical fact while the others aren’t.

        Originally posted by tabibito View Post
        In this case, it is the record of an actual event which occurred during Logos mission as the messiah; briefly alluded to in Luke 10:18, and recapitulated in Revelation.
        Check your chronology. The event in question originated centuries prior in oral tradition, was finally recorded in 100BCE, and was further fleshed out in Revelation. John Milton goes to town with the myth in the 17th century.

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by tabibito View Post

          There is, also in Revelation, a reference to the angels of the churches - the text does not make it clear whether it refers to celestial angels, or human messengers.



          That was a declaration to a very ordinarily human king - a usage loosely akin to the common modern use of star with reference to a person ... pop- movie- rising- -star.
          It is also a reference to Satan. Double Entendre.

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
            Obviously the moon landings developed from earlier fictional accounts including Jules Verne's From the Earth to the Moon and H. G. Wells' The First Men in the Moon
            Don't get me started on Star Trek and current technology: Medical scanners, sensors, talking computers, personal communication devices, warp drive

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by Sparko View Post

              Don't get me started on Star Trek and current technology: Medical scanners, sensors, talking computers, personal communication devices, warp drive
              PBS had an interesting show about Star Trek-like technology starting to appear in our daily lives. I think it was back in the flip phone era (communicators)

              I'm always still in trouble again

              "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
              "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
              "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by tabibito View Post

                Earth might be considered a place of exile, certainly: and (for a time) Satan rules Earth as its god, with the churches (i.e. the congregations of the faithful) being embassies.
                Zero evidence of such.

                If Satan is in time and space and can travel through the universe, his taking exile on a completely lifeless planet for three billion years suggests a singular lack of adventure and intelligence.

                Perhaps he was playing Texas Hold Em with his minions during this period?

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
                  Obviously the moon landings developed from earlier fictional accounts including Jules Verne's From the Earth to the Moon and H. G. Wells' The First Men in the Moon
                  Stories of visiting the moon go back farther than that. Read Lucian of Samosata.

                  "It ain't necessarily so
                  The things that you're liable
                  To read in the Bible
                  It ain't necessarily so
                  ."

                  Sportin' Life
                  Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post

                    Stories of visiting the moon go back farther than that. Read Lucian of Samosata.
                    Indeed. Even early scientists like Kepler tried his hand at it.

                    I'm always still in trouble again

                    "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                    "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                    "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by whag View Post

                      Zero evidence of such.

                      If Satan is in time and space and can travel through the universe, his taking exile on a completely lifeless planet for three billion years suggests a singular lack of adventure and intelligence.

                      Perhaps he was playing Texas Hold Em with his minions during this period?
                      What makes you think it happened before humans? Perhaps Satan giving Eve the forbidden fruit was the initial "rebellion" event? After all that is when creation fell.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                        It is also a reference to Satan. Double Entendre.
                        It is nothing of the sort
                        Lucifer (Latin: planet Venus) is not a name or title for Satan
                        It is a loose translation from the Hebrew ( הֵילֵל - someone or something of radiant splendour)
                        The Latin lucifer translates the Greek translation (εωσφορος) early light (dawn), (planet) Venus as the dawn star.
                        Lucifer is (in older English translations) used only once in the Old Testament. εωσφορος is thrice used: Job 11:17; 38:12 - early light (dawn), and Isaiah 14:12 - (son of the) dawn.
                        As an epithet, it is simply a term describing the position that the king had held with relation to God and God's favour.

                        φωσφορος is used in the NT. 2Peter 1:19, light bearer.carrier.

                        That is not an exhaustive investigation of the use and meaning φωσφορ~, εωσφορ~


                        1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
                        .
                        ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
                        Scripture before Tradition:
                        but that won't prevent others from
                        taking it upon themselves to deprive you
                        of the right to call yourself Christian.

                        ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by whag View Post

                          Zero evidence of such.

                          If Satan is in time and space and can travel through the universe, his taking exile on a completely lifeless planet for three billion years suggests a singular lack of adventure and intelligence.

                          Perhaps he was playing Texas Hold Em with his minions during this period?
                          Given that he had a place in heaven up until the events described in Revelation and alluded to by Luke, the timing would have been roughly two-thousand years ago, and the objection assumes that he would not have been stripped of the ability or opportunity to travel at will. Nor does getting exiled indicate that the exiled person chose anything - exile usually indicates a circumstance that is imposed. The circumstances indicate that self exile would not be on the table.
                          1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
                          .
                          ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
                          Scripture before Tradition:
                          but that won't prevent others from
                          taking it upon themselves to deprive you
                          of the right to call yourself Christian.

                          ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by Sparko View Post

                            What makes you think it happened before humans? Perhaps Satan giving Eve the forbidden fruit was the initial "rebellion" event?
                            The common Christian view is that Satan's fall occurred before Eden, setting up the narrative backdrop and flow of the story:
                            • Satan is a good and obedient servant
                            • Satan goes bad
                            • Satan is cast out of heaven as punishment
                            • Satan sabotages creation as revenge


                            Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                            After all that is when creation fell.
                            Creation didn’t fall. You keep saying this without explaining what a fallen creation looks like. It’s an assumption based on Christianity’s inability to process predation, disease, and calamity.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by Sparko View Post

                              What makes you think it happened before humans? Perhaps Satan giving Eve the forbidden fruit was the initial "rebellion" event? After all that is when creation fell.
                              Satan has nothing to do with Eve and any forbidden fruit. The serpent is not Satan.

                              Now the serpent was more crafty than any other wild animal that the Lord God had made.
                              "It ain't necessarily so
                              The things that you're liable
                              To read in the Bible
                              It ain't necessarily so
                              ."

                              Sportin' Life
                              Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by tabibito View Post

                                It is nothing of the sort
                                Lucifer (Latin: planet Venus) is not a name or title for Satan
                                It is a loose translation from the Hebrew ( הֵילֵל - someone or something of radiant splendour)
                                The Latin lucifer translates the Greek translation (εωσφορος) early light (dawn), (planet) Venus as the dawn star.
                                Lucifer is (in older English translations) used only once in the Old Testament. εωσφορος is thrice used: Job 11:17; 38:12 - early light (dawn), and Isaiah 14:12 - (son of the) dawn.
                                As an epithet, it is simply a term describing the position that the king had held with relation to God and God's favour.

                                φωσφορος is used in the NT. 2Peter 1:19, light bearer.carrier.

                                That is not an exhaustive investigation of the use and meaning φωσφορ~, εωσφορ~

                                The planet Venus as a rebellious figure is also implied in Ugaritic texts.
                                "It ain't necessarily so
                                The things that you're liable
                                To read in the Bible
                                It ain't necessarily so
                                ."

                                Sportin' Life
                                Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin

                                Comment

                                Related Threads

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by Sparko, 06-25-2024, 03:03 PM
                                37 responses
                                186 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
                                Started by Cow Poke, 06-20-2024, 10:04 AM
                                27 responses
                                146 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Cow Poke  
                                Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 06-18-2024, 08:18 AM
                                82 responses
                                478 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
                                Started by whag, 06-15-2024, 09:43 AM
                                156 responses
                                639 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post tabibito  
                                Started by whag, 04-09-2024, 01:04 PM
                                468 responses
                                2,140 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
                                Working...
                                X