Originally posted by Zymologist
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Amphitheater Guidelines
See more
See less
SJW Wars: The Force Awakens
Collapse
X
-
"The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy
-
Originally posted by Adrift View PostThat's an interesting theory. In The Clone Wars animated series they show a primitive lightsaber called the "Darksaber".
"The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostAwhile back I saw a website that explained what the various colors of the light sabers meant but nothing on one that essentially "sizzled." And the cross guard idea is IMHO moronic in that it only makes it more deadly for the wielder.
And even a quiz that you can take.
I'm a Jedi with a blue blade.
And another test.
This time I have a yellow blade
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
Originally posted by lilpixieofterror View PostGosh, you're so making me want to go back and re-watch The Close wars series on Netflix.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adrift View PostIt's hard to get into at first, but the last few seasons are pretty amazing. I've mentally decided it's not canonical, because in my mind no media exists prior to Episode IV, but as fan fiction it's not half bad.The Axis of Evilerr... I mean 'the separatist' into more than two dimensional cardboard cuts out, that are evil just for the sake of being evil."The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy
Comment
-
Originally posted by lilpixieofterror View PostDon't know if I'd go that far, but I've enjoyed the episodes I've seen so far. I do like how the series doesn't try to make secondary characters into incompetent morons that makes you wonder how they lived past childhood, let alone were able to become soldiers/Jedi/Sith and I also like how the Jedi don't treat their troops as just cannon fodder, to be disposed of at will. However; I do wish they would take the time to makeThe Axis of Evilerr... I mean 'the separatist' into more than two dimensional cardboard cuts out, that are evil just for the sake of being evil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostNext up:
Is BB8 really the love child of WALL-E and R2D2?
Well, that, and the new emperor is just a troll from the Hobbit.
I think the Empire is supposed to be a shell of itself with an inferiority complex (thus, the new super death star, but when a general fails, Ren just destroys a console), and still unable to find the droid they were looking for.
I think this movie does a good job setting up the remaining movies, introducing us to what's going on now, introducing us to a new hero(ine), an imperfect and savable villain, and getting Harrison Ford out of a movie series he didn't want to do in the first place.
Comment
-
One of my gripes about the film was how the Empire could be crumpled in the first trilogy, and rise from the ashes so quickly as to produce a mega-deathstar planet in just 30-some years. Then I started thinking about it in terms of WWI and WWII with the 30 years in between being a sort of Weimar period. That makes sense of a lot of the imagery in the film as a rising Reich. Which brings into question...if Luke's promise was to bring balance to the force, did he do so in the first trilogy or will he do so in the second trilogy? Or both? Or neither?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adrift View PostOne of my gripes about the film was how the Empire could be crumpled in the first trilogy, and rise from the ashes so quickly as to produce a mega-deathstar planet in just 30-some years. Then I started thinking about it in terms of WWI and WWII with the 30 years in between being a sort of Weimar period. That makes sense of a lot of the imagery in the film as a rising Reich. Which brings into question...if Luke's promise was to bring balance to the force, did he do so in the first trilogy or will he do so in the second trilogy? Or both? Or neither?
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostIt should of never crumbled in the first place. Take for example Rome. Several Roman emperors were assassinated but the Empire kept going.Don't call it a comeback. It's a riposte.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spartacus View PostThat was later on, after the establishment of the imperial dynasty and such. Without a clear way to find a successor to Palpatine, who seems to have not planned on ever stepping down, it's doubtful that it could continue, at least as an "empire."
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostHistorically speaking that leads to a civil war.Don't call it a comeback. It's a riposte.
Comment
-
I didn't care for the movie at all. Too many boxes getting checked, too little originality (or the wrong sort of it). Too many jarring things that don't make any sense. How are you siphoning a sun? That's not how it works. Leia and Han have kids, and one of them ends up a Dark Jedi, but it isn't Kylo Ren. They could have made it be some unknown player and had a much better story. The Force typically takes years of training, even for extremely gifted people. It makes sense that Rey can draw from it unknowingly, but she goes from not doing anything to mind control and object manipulation. The epiphany at the end could make sense in a way, but it's too 'Power of Names'.
There's a lot of good content in existing Star Wars media, including the games and books. There are lots of places to 'fill in' between existing stories and stick to a consistent canon. There's lots of places to create something altogether new and stick to a consistent canon. It didn't seem to me like they bothered to do that. They just made a new Star Wars movie to have a new Star Wars movie, and that's disappointing.I'm not here anymore.
Comment
-
Originally posted by robrecht View PostThe other mystery is who Rae is, possibly the daughter of Luke Skywalker or his niece, ie, a daughter of Han Solo and General Organa (Princess Leia) who was hidden away like Luke and Leia were for their own protection. Also, I wonder if Kylo-Ren or the Knights of Ren killed off the other new Jedi in training as Anakin and the Clone Troopers did in Episode 3.
If anyone wants to develop the story with a more dramatic and intriguing, there should be a character who eventually restores not only a balance between the dark and light sides, but actually succeeds in integrating and uniting them. I don't think they will do this, but it has actually been suggested by a theologian of sorts.I'm not here anymore.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zymologist View PostI'm wondering if there's an explanation for Ren's lightsaber looking so unique (not just the cross hilt; the "blade" itself looked different from any other lightsabers in the movies) or if they just did it because it looked cool.
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostAwhile back I saw a website that explained what the various colors of the light sabers meant but nothing on one that essentially "sizzled." And the cross guard idea is IMHO moronic in that it only makes it more deadly for the wielder.
Originally posted by Adrift View PostOne fan theory is that, since Kylo never finished his Jedi training, he didn't know how to built a proper lightsaber. Another theory is that he didn't have the resources to build one, especially as crystals are not easy to come by.
Basically, the sizzling and "guard" on the sword is venting from an incomplete or unstable lightsaber.
According to secondary media (the cartoons, books, whatnot), Jedi blue and green swords are colored because of the natural crystals they find in caves. Sith red swords contains synthetic crystals.
Samuel Jackson's purple lightsaber was allowed simply because Jackson loves the color purple, and it was part of the deal for him to play Mace Windu. I thought that was a goofy decision, and that (along with the rest of the prequels) I've decided do not exist.
Originally posted by Zymologist View PostI've heard that theory.
I heard another one that argued that his lightsaber was of a more ancient design, which now that I think about it might (if true) have implications for Supreme Leader Snoke and just who he is....I'm not here anymore.
Comment
Comment