Originally posted by Papa Zoom
View Post
This baby is 24 weeks old. So he/she should still be inside of mom. If there, he/she is a fetus. That makes no sense to me. We all know what's growing inside a mother womb. It's her baby. That's how everyone defines it. The other terms used simply designate a particular point of development. When a woman has a miscarriage, she talks about losing the baby. I have never once heard a woman talk about her zygote or her fetus. It's always about a baby.
The truth is, abortion rights advocates use whatever tactics will work to desensitize the public about abortion. So according to them it can't be a baby and it can't be a person. There are still some here that argue the developing baby isn't a human being!
Remember back when we were all told it was just a blob of cells? I know women who are told this today. Women are not given the full story about what it is they are aborting.
People can argue all day long on what to call the unborn. Without any doubt, a new and unique human being comes into existence at the moment of conception. This is a fact of science. Period. It seems to me that fact alone should be enough to know that it's immoral to kill the unborn.
The truth is, abortion rights advocates use whatever tactics will work to desensitize the public about abortion. So according to them it can't be a baby and it can't be a person. There are still some here that argue the developing baby isn't a human being!
Remember back when we were all told it was just a blob of cells? I know women who are told this today. Women are not given the full story about what it is they are aborting.
People can argue all day long on what to call the unborn. Without any doubt, a new and unique human being comes into existence at the moment of conception. This is a fact of science. Period. It seems to me that fact alone should be enough to know that it's immoral to kill the unborn.
To most people:
unwanted child = fetus
wanted child = baby
Comment