I don't understand why the opinions of the guys who have actually been cops and who have direct experience with this sort of thing don't seem to be worth anything. This is just weird.
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Ferguson Grand Jury...
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Zymologist View PostI don't understand why the opinions of the guys who have actually been cops and who have direct experience with this sort of thing don't seem to be worth anything. This is just weird.
But, I agree.... weird!The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zymologist View PostI don't understand why the opinions of the guys who have actually been cops and who have direct experience with this sort of thing don't seem to be worth anything. This is just weird.We know J6 wasn’t peaceful because they didn’t set the building on fire.
Comment
-
I think the real problem here is that there is such disparity between....
The MEDIA version, which had a poor black kid "hands up" being shot by a racist white police officer...
and the FACTS, which are totally divorced from that narrative.
Fortunately, the Grand Jury examined the FACTS, not the hype.
UNFORTUNATELY, the "demonstrators" refused to accept the FACTS in favor of the media hype.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by square_peg View PostAlright then. I was just trying to reconstruct what I believed whag's argument to be.
A success rate of over 90% seems to be worth using with reasonable confidence.
Hang on, let me make sure I'm not conflating anything here. I was under the impression that the mace Wilson referred to was the product sold on Mace.com, which says "Mace Pepper Spray"--that is, I thought "Mace" was the brand name for a type of pepper spray. Meanwhile, what you describe seems to be referring to the slightly different type of spray called mace, yet you're calling it pepper spray. What's going on here? This Berkeley police bulletin says that pepper spray causes immediate inflammation of the respiratory system, which seems to conflict with your "4-8 seconds" claim. (It immediately takes effect but the subject somehow doesn't feel pain for several more seconds?) Additionally, it also states that "Individuals, such as the mentally disturbed or those under the influence of intoxicants, who have a high tolerance to pain, are still subject to the inflammatory effects of Pepper Spray." This is supported by the information page here, which says "Even if the subject cannot feel pain due to drugs, alcohol or being emotionally disturbed, the inflammatory effects of pepper spray cause the eyes to close temporarily when the ocular area is saturated."
And if Wilson had the substance that's different from pepper spray, then that begs the following question--if mace is less effective than pepper spray, then why wasn't he carrying the more effective substance?
This, too, conflicts with what I've read. For instance, as Taser.com (which, I mean, is the company that manufactures tasers) declares here, "TASER Cartridges Separate TASER CEWs from the Competition. With ranges from 15 to 35 feet (4.5 to 10.6 meters), and accuracy that can't be matched, they are the choice for law enforcement everywhere." There can hardly be a maximum deployment range of 15 feet if this product listed on the website has a range of up to 35 feet.
Which is why I believe that he (and the Ferguson police department as well, I suppose) didn't handle/prepare for possible dangerous situations as well as they could have and should have.
But he individually didn't need to "win" a fight. He said he was planning on buying time for backup to arrive; retreating would accomplish that as well.
Well, as I said, he supposedly considered using pepper spray BEFORE the gun while his life was literally in immediate danger (when he was allegedly being punched), but didn't consider using pepper spray when his life wasn't in immediate danger? That's an inconsistent line of thought. It makes sense to use a gun when one's life is in immediate danger, and significantly less sense when one's life is not in immediate danger. Seems rather straightforward to me. Wilson's basically saying "I was hesitant to use a gun when he was basically upon me trying to kill me, but I was trigger-happy when he was quite a distance from me."
That said, you're welcome to read all the literature you want and buy completely into manufacturer hype. I've based my statements off of recollection from when I went through the certification program to use the item, reactions I've seen in real life, and from personal experience when I was sprayed with it. If you don't want to believe me, I'm not going to bend over backwards to convince you.
Regarding the taser...I'm glad you feel motivated to research the product. A little more research and you would have better grasp on the subject. I do need to pause and correct my earlier post - when I said 15 feet, I should have said 21 feet. Same principles apply, but I had the number wrong.
Tasers have cartridges that are attached to the front of the device. The cartridge contains the metal probes (straightened fish hooks, in case you're curious), the wires, and a gas propellant. These types of cartridges are single-use only. Different cartridges are used for different purposes. The cartridges I use (and...well, everyone other department I've seen) have a maximum distance of 21 feet. The 35 feet cartridges are intended for a different application because their minimum practical deployment distance is greater (in other words, you have to be so many feet away from the target or the probes won't spread enough to get a good hit). There are a few other options, but I based my statements off of what are commonly used.
I don't have time to address your last paragraph about what happened after Wilson got out of the car, but I'll be happy to do so shortly."If you believe, take the first step, it leads to Jesus Christ. If you don't believe, take the first step all the same, for you are bidden to take it. No one wants to know about your faith or unbelief, your orders are to perform the act of obedience on the spot. Then you will find yourself in the situation where faith becomes possible and where faith exists in the true sense of the word." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship
Comment
-
Originally posted by square_peg View PostBut he individually didn't need to "win" a fight. He said he was planning on buying time for backup to arrive; retreating would accomplish that as well.
Well, as I said, he supposedly considered using pepper spray BEFORE the gun while his life was literally in immediate danger (when he was allegedly being punched), but didn't consider using pepper spray when his life wasn't in immediate danger? That's an inconsistent line of thought. It makes sense to use a gun when one's life is in immediate danger, and significantly less sense when one's life is not in immediate danger. Seems rather straightforward to me. Wilson's basically saying "I was hesitant to use a gun when he was basically upon me trying to kill me, but I was trigger-happy when he was quite a distance from me."
I think Officer Wilson had already dismissed the use of lower force options because of how far the situation had progressed. As long as Brown continued in the same manner (i.e. the same level of aggression), I think deadly force was still justified. From everything I've read, Brown ran away from Officer Wilson, who chased him. Then, Brown stopped and charged at Officer Wilson. At this point Officer Wilson began launching .40 rounds at Brown, hoping to stop him. Brown didn't stop until one of those rounds struck his head. This was apparently corroborated by SOME witness testimony, as well as the placement of physical evidence like blood, the body, and shell casings.
Personally, if I shoot a man and he begins charging at me while I'm still pointing a gun at him...I can only assume he means to kill me, because I've already shot him. It's become a life or death show-down, and I'll do whatever I can to win."If you believe, take the first step, it leads to Jesus Christ. If you don't believe, take the first step all the same, for you are bidden to take it. No one wants to know about your faith or unbelief, your orders are to perform the act of obedience on the spot. Then you will find yourself in the situation where faith becomes possible and where faith exists in the true sense of the word." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship
Comment
-
Originally posted by myth View PostI can just as easily argue that it was Officer Wilson's sworn duty to arrest Brown. It's hard to arrest someone you're running away from.
I think Officer Wilson had already dismissed the use of lower force options because of how far the situation had progressed. As long as Brown continued in the same manner (i.e. the same level of aggression), I think deadly force was still justified. From everything I've read, Brown ran away from Officer Wilson, who chased him. Then, Brown stopped and charged at Officer Wilson. At this point Officer Wilson began launching .40 rounds at Brown, hoping to stop him. Brown didn't stop until one of those rounds struck his head. This was apparently corroborated by SOME witness testimony, as well as the placement of physical evidence like blood, the body, and shell casings.
Personally, if I shoot a man and he begins charging at me while I'm still pointing a gun at him...I can only assume he means to kill me, because I've already shot him. It's become a life or death show-down, and I'll do whatever I can to win.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
are there not enough black cops to put in black communities?
(asking because I really don't know)To say that crony capitalism is not true/free market capitalism, is like saying a grand slam is not true baseball, or like saying scoring a touchdown is not true American football ...Stefan Mykhaylo D
Comment
-
The type of mediocre blacks who would make good cops are in high demand by white people looking to prove they're not racist so they have no reason to settle for a US Army tour of duty in Detroit or Ferguson."As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:12
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jordanriver View Postare there not enough black cops to put in black communities?
(asking because I really don't know)
But...no, they're aren't enough. I think it's a product of the cultural environment that a lot of black people grow up in (hate or distrust of law enforcement). Quite frankly, there are very few black applicants to the field in our community. And some of those applicants are not qualified by either state standards or local preferences. It makes it difficult to hire racial minorities when a lot of the qualified ones have no interest in working a low-paying job in law enforcement."If you believe, take the first step, it leads to Jesus Christ. If you don't believe, take the first step all the same, for you are bidden to take it. No one wants to know about your faith or unbelief, your orders are to perform the act of obedience on the spot. Then you will find yourself in the situation where faith becomes possible and where faith exists in the true sense of the word." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship
Comment
-
Originally posted by square_peg View PostPepper spray, however, supposedly has immediate effects and causes involuntary closure of the eyes and respiratory inflammation, thereby preventing the subject from seeing and breathing properly--and it seems to me that it's rather difficult to "fight through it" and attack someone when you can't breathe properly or see where the person is.
I have sources from the Taser company itself that seem to dispute your claim about "very limited range," and Johnson wasn't the one allegedly running towards Wilson, so there wouldn't be any need to use a taser on him.
I am absolutely not defending criminal behavior. I'm simply defending a person's right to life, no matter what sort of horrendous thing he might've done.
That would certainly help things, but no--that implies that people who do assault the police deserve to be killed, which I don't agree with at all. Do you not believe in an infinitely great God who has the power to forgive and reform even the most hardened, vicious criminals?"The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostWhat makes you think pepper spray is more effective than Mace?
Because Pepper Spray causes a number of physiological effects on a person—even those with elevated pain tolerance due to prior use of alcohol and/or other drugs—it is different than Mace, which relies mainly on pain compliance. Individuals, such as the mentally disturbed or those under the influence of intoxicants, who have a
high tolerance to pain, are still subject to the inflammatory effects of Pepper Spray.
And this information page from a certain brand of pepper spray:
The biggest advantage pepper spray provides the user, whether law enforcement or civilian, is the involuntary eye closure. Even if the subject cannot feel pain due to drugs, alcohol or being emotionally disturbed, the inflammatory effects of pepper spray cause the eyes to close temporarily when the ocular area is saturated.
It's what we call "corroborative" evidence -- Wilson's testimony was that Brown was enraged. The Grand Jury, who looked at ALL the actual facts, evidence, and testimony under oath --- not just the news media's hype that you keep relying on --- chose to "no bill" him.
A) It is Wilson's choice to make based on the circumstances at the time
2) The Grand Jury, with all facts and testimony available to them, obviously believed Wilson.Learn to do right; seek justice. Defend the oppressed. Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow.--Isaiah 1:17
I don't think that all forms o[f] slavery are inherently immoral.--seer
Comment
-
Originally posted by myth View PostThat said, you're welcome to read all the literature you want and buy completely into manufacturer hype. I've based my statements off of recollection from when I went through the certification program to use the item, reactions I've seen in real life, and from personal experience when I was sprayed with it. If you don't want to believe me, I'm not going to bend over backwards to convince you.
Tasers have cartridges that are attached to the front of the device. The cartridge contains the metal probes (straightened fish hooks, in case you're curious), the wires, and a gas propellant. These types of cartridges are single-use only. Different cartridges are used for different purposes. The cartridges I use (and...well, everyone other department I've seen) have a maximum distance of 21 feet. The 35 feet cartridges are intended for a different application because their minimum practical deployment distance is greater (in other words, you have to be so many feet away from the target or the probes won't spread enough to get a good hit). There are a few other options, but I based my statements off of what are commonly used.Learn to do right; seek justice. Defend the oppressed. Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow.--Isaiah 1:17
I don't think that all forms o[f] slavery are inherently immoral.--seer
Comment
-
Originally posted by square_peg View PostThe first one is precisely that which I don't believe is right.
He had started firing when Brown was quite a distance away.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by square_peg View PostThe first source was from police, who presumablyThe first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Cow Poke, Today, 11:05 AM
|
8 responses
50 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Starlight
Today, 06:20 PM
|
||
Started by CivilDiscourse, Today, 05:24 AM
|
37 responses
170 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Today, 03:27 PM
|
||
Started by seer, 05-18-2024, 11:06 AM
|
49 responses
286 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
Today, 04:14 PM
|
||
Started by carpedm9587, 05-18-2024, 07:03 AM
|
19 responses
141 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by One Bad Pig
Today, 09:58 AM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 05-17-2024, 09:51 AM
|
0 responses
27 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
05-17-2024, 09:51 AM
|
Comment