Originally posted by myth
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Re: Michael Brown
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by myth View PostWith regard to the discussion of homeowners shooting unarmed people breaking into their homes -- the simple answer is that you have the right to defend your life with deadly force, but not your property.
But given the totality of the circumstances, one may be able to articulate enough facts to justify a shooting that at first appears to violate this concept. Small details matter.
As a case study, one of our local prosecutors told me about something that happened several years ago where I live. A man owned two homes, and one had recently been broken into while he was not there. The thieves has taken thousands of dollars of electronic equipment, which he had recently replaced. He drove out to the house one night to check the property. Coming up the driveway, he encountered a car. He got out of his vehicle and approached the car, noticing that it was loaded down with all the new electronics he had recently bought. So then he stepped into the woods and waited till two men came out of his house and got into the car. Then he stepped out in front of car, and shot and killed both of them. He was arrested and charged with murder (because, well, the law's pretty clear on that part).
But when it went to grand jury, they found no probable cause. The DA's Office took it back to the same grand jury, and again the grand jury found no probable cause. When a new DA was sworn in (and a new grand jury was empaneled) the new DA presented it one last time to a new grand jury, which again found no probable cause. The defendant was ultimately released, and even successfully petitioned the court to have his arrest expunged.
The law's about proportionality of force. You can't just execute someone because they're taking your property. But it's ultimately up to citizens in your community and sometimes, as we see, the citizens make their own decisions about right/wrong, irrespective of the law.
Source
The rationale for this is that if, as in your example, the individual tried to stop the two men from stealing his stuff, it's likely he would have been attacked and possibly even killed. Deadly force is then permissible.Last edited by Cow Poke; 08-27-2014, 01:34 PM.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostThat's simply not true in all states.
Again, depends on the locality.
Source
The rationale for this is that if, as in your example, the individual tried to stop the two men from stealing his stuff, it's likely he would have been attacked and possibly even killed. Deadly force is then permissible."What has the Church gained if it is popular, but there is no conviction, no repentance, no power?" - A.W. Tozer
"... there are two parties in Washington, the stupid party and the evil party, who occasionally get together and do something both stupid and evil, and this is called bipartisanship." - Everett Dirksen
Comment
-
Originally posted by Littlejoe View PostYep! Don't mess with Texas...or in this case our Stuff here in Texas!The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Psychic Missile View PostI guess that invalidates historical and ongoing police training and tactics!
Or you're an idiot that doesn't understand police training and tactics to start with, but thinks he's qualified to talk about things he knows nothing about. Tell me PM, what is your experience in police training or tactics? Any at all? How about in any kind of defense? What is your experience in any of that stuff?
"If it's legal, it must be moral." I see.
That idea exists because a police officer should not have their life threatened by an unarmed person.
Where did you come up with that nonsense? From the same source that told you about police training and tactics? What is your experience in unarmed combat? Do you seriously think you can teach somebody to be a martial artist, that is capable of taking on anybody and everybody, in a matter of weeks? In reality, people don't just become world class fighters in a matter of weeks.
Their training and tools should be more than adequate. There are several countries which do not arm their beat officers with firearms. I don't expect American police officers to not carry a gun. Our geographic location and our history of gun distribution makes an assailant with a firearm an ever-present reality. I do expect American police to use the same tactics used in those countries I mentioned when dealing with unarmed assailants, or indeed any unarmed person. Killing someone should be a last resort. Not a matter of course.
A little while ago people in this thread were saying things like "if a thief broke into my house, I would shoot them". I really don't understand this. Though it might be legal, it is not self defense. Unless threatening harm, implicit or implied, only one's possessions are in danger. I think this ties into the mentality of police carrying guns. The old adage "if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail". I hope that's the explanation. An alternative is that many people just don't value human life. If imminent harm is not one's criteria for justifiable self-defense, where does one draw the line?"The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy
Comment
-
Originally posted by lilpixieofterror View PostThey have already broken the law by breaking into your house. What lengths are they willing to go to keep themselves out of prison? Lots are more than willing to kill in order to do this. Hey though, if you want to get yourself in the ICU for a few weeks or worse, hey... tell me how that works out. I think though I'd prefer to error on caution and defend myself from a potential dangerous criminal that has already proved they have no regard for the law.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostPerhaps PM is unaware of the rash of home invasions where they don't exactly stop to discuss with you what your options are."The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy
Comment
-
According to FBI stats, more people are murdered every year by "personal weapons (hands, fists, feet, etc.)" than by blunt weapons or even shotguns and rifles (not to mention poisoning, fire, explosives, etc.).
Unquestionably, "unarmed" does not mean "poses no significant threat to ones life."
Comment
-
Originally posted by CMD View PostAccording to FBI stats, more people are murdered every year by "personal weapons (hands, fists, feet, etc.)" than by blunt weapons or even shotguns and rifles (not to mention poisoning, fire, explosives, etc.).
Unquestionably, "unarmed" does not mean "poses no significant threat to ones life."I DENOUNCE DONALD J. TRUMP AND ALL HIS IMMORAL ACTS.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Psychic Missile View PostA little while ago people in this thread were saying things like "if a thief broke into my house, I would shoot them". I really don't understand this. Though it might be legal, it is not self defense. Unless threatening harm, implicit or implied, only one's possessions are in danger. I think this ties into the mentality of police carrying guns. The old adage "if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail". I hope that's the explanation. An alternative is that many people just don't value human life. If imminent harm is not one's criteria for justifiable self-defense, where does one draw the line?Micah 6:8 He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostThe difference would be someone breaking into where you are, versus you shooting someone who is stealing something of yours where you are not. For example, you look out the window and see someone stealing your car. You can't usually go out there and shoot the guy (some states might allow it). But if you wake up in the middle of the night to find someone has broken into your house, then you really don't need to check to see if they are just wanting your property or are willing to harm you. The logical deduction is that if they see you, they will try to harm you to get away without being caught."If you believe, take the first step, it leads to Jesus Christ. If you don't believe, take the first step all the same, for you are bidden to take it. No one wants to know about your faith or unbelief, your orders are to perform the act of obedience on the spot. Then you will find yourself in the situation where faith becomes possible and where faith exists in the true sense of the word." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostThat's simply not true in all states.
Again, depends on the locality.
Source
The rationale for this is that if, as in your example, the individual tried to stop the two men from stealing his stuff, it's likely he would have been attacked and possibly even killed. Deadly force is then permissible."If you believe, take the first step, it leads to Jesus Christ. If you don't believe, take the first step all the same, for you are bidden to take it. No one wants to know about your faith or unbelief, your orders are to perform the act of obedience on the spot. Then you will find yourself in the situation where faith becomes possible and where faith exists in the true sense of the word." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship
Comment
-
Originally posted by myth View PostGonna be honest, I didn't realize that some states differed quite that much. Also...maybe I should move to Texas.
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
Originally posted by robrecht View PostHow much of the officer's statement at the time do we know? I don't think the claim that Michael Brown was going for his gun originated 2 weeks after the incident. Can you cite the law or policy that says a violent felon fleeing from the police cannot or should not be shot at unless he poses an imminent threat to police or others? I'm not sure that is the case.
Edited to add:
The story about the struggle for the gun was already mentioned during the initial police press conference, not only mentioned 2 weeks later:
http://www.ksdk.com/story/news/crime...rown/13860601/
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostThe officer himself never filed an incident report, so the officer at the press conference can allege anything he wants. If you notice when asked about what happened outside the car in sight of any potential witnesses, such as "was Michael Brown charging at the officer" he didn't allege anything. Why not?אָכֵ֕ן אַתָּ֖ה אֵ֣ל מִסְתַּתֵּ֑ר אֱלֹהֵ֥י יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל מוֹשִֽׁיעַ׃
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seanD, Yesterday, 05:54 PM
|
0 responses
17 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
Yesterday, 05:54 PM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 05-14-2024, 09:50 PM
|
55 responses
246 views
1 like
|
Last Post
by Stoic
Yesterday, 08:49 PM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 05-14-2024, 04:03 AM
|
25 responses
126 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Yesterday, 11:21 AM | ||
Started by carpedm9587, 05-13-2024, 12:51 PM
|
133 responses
791 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by carpedm9587
Yesterday, 09:15 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, 05-13-2024, 06:47 AM
|
5 responses
47 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by mossrose
05-13-2024, 12:18 PM
|
Comment