Why I Voted For Trump...

[Charles]

Without comment, so I suppose you bought it.

I found it funny that you used such strong words to describe what was so easily shown to be a correct quote.

You haven't demonstrated any such thing - I know that part by heart. I was objecting to the whole rest of the OPINION.

Nope. Here is what you said:

Further, as has already been pointed out, we don't have a pope, and your quote that the "SBC's official position" is part of the OPINION piece you cited from those crazy right wing conservative nutjobs at CNN.

If you'd like to see the best representation of what Southern Baptists believe, you can check out the Baptist Faith & Message to which many of us subscribe. Note, however, that we are not a creedal people, and nobody is forced to agree with this position.

And then you pointed me to where I could find the exact same quote. So "If you'd like to see the best representation of what Southern Baptists believe" pointed me to a place where I saw exactly the same as I saw among the "crazy", the "talking heads" and whatever you liked to call them.

And, again, this is why nobody enjoys conversing with you. It's like you work hard to try to misconstrue something so you can argue it.

You took issues with a correct quote. I asked you for the reasons. Provide it instead of claiming i misconstrue something.

I took issue with you thinking you know anything about the Southern Baptists, you goofus. You have been CONSISTENTLY wrong about so many things.

That is a claim that you are yet to support. Based on the above I would like to see some more support. I know and have pointed out that we find members of the cult of death among the Southern Baptists.

[Cow Poke]

You took issues with a correct quote.

I took issue with you getting your information from a hit piece from CNN - I pointed you to the correct site.

Now, do you actually have a point?

[Charles]

I took issue with you getting your information from CNN - I pointed you to the correct site.

Where I found the same information despite your description of CNN ("Crazy", "talking heads" and the like)

Now, do you actually have a point?

See above.

Since you are concerned about the cult of death (and rightly so) I wonder why you are trying to do your best to take focus away from it as soon as it is found among the Southern Baptists.

[Cow Poke]

Since you are concerned about the cult of death (and rightly so) I wonder why you are trying to do your best to take focus away from it as soon as it is found among the Southern Baptists.

You're making no sense at all -

A) It's the "culture of death", not the "cult of death" - I wasn't calling anybody a cult.
2) I was showing your the Baptist Faith & Message minus all the editorial crap you pointed to from CNN's hit piece.

Now, again, do you actually have a point?

[Charles]

You're making no sense at all -

A) It's the "culture of death", not the "cult of death" - I wasn't calling anybody a cult.
2) I was showing your the Baptist Faith & Message minus all the editorial crap you pointed to from CNN's hit piece.

Now, again, do you actually have a point?

The "crap" on CNN and what was on the page you pointed me to was the same. That is one interesting point. If you are too worried about attacking others for no valid reasons you must live with the consequences when it turns out your reasons were no good.

Are you seriously suggesting there is nothing to be worried about when people join the cult of death or why are you asking what the point is?

[Cow Poke]

The "crap" on CNN and what was on the page you pointed me to was the same.

No, the EDITORIAL crap on CNN is NOT on the SBC website.

That is one interesting point.

You have a strange sense of "interest".

If you are too worried about attacking others for no valid reasons you must live with the consequences when it turns out your reasons were no good.

What, exactly, do you think I'm "worried" about?

Are you seriously suggesting there is nothing to be worried about when people join the cult of death or why are you asking what the point is?

OK, try this. Put down what you're smoking, take a break, and come back when you can actually make sense, OK?

[Charles]

No, the EDITORIAL crap on CNN is NOT on the SBC website.



You have a strange sense of "interest".



What, exactly, do you think I'm "worried" about?



OK, try this. Put down what you're smoking, take a break, and come back when you can actually make sense, OK?

Too many ad hominems for me to worry about answering. If you can provide good reasons or questions that do not rely on personal attacks and the like I will be happy to continue.

[Cow Poke]

Too many ad hominems for me to worry about answering.

But you never fail to whine about an ad hom. That's rather snowflake of you, Charles.

If you can provide good reasons or questions that do not rely on personal attacks and the like I will be happy to continue.

Yeah, I lay awake every night worrying about you continuing.

Evidently, you never had a point to begin with.

[Tassman]

So killing millions of our own offspring is a culture of life...

Oxford. A zygote, embryo or fetus are not usually referred to as "offspring".https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...ded-Roe-v-Wade

[Cow Poke]

Oxford. A zygote, embryo or fetus are not usually referred to as "offspring".

When you say "not usually referred to", you're excluding a very high number of actual biologists.

Biologists' Consensus on 'When Life Begins'

Overall, 95% of all biologists affirmed the biological view that a human's life begins at fertilization (5212 out of 5502).

HUMAN LIFE is overwhelmingly recognized by BIOLOGISTS as beginning at conception - disciples of the culture of death ignore science and come up with convoluted excuses to continue the slaughter.

[rogue06]

When you say "not usually referred to", you're excluding a very high number of actual biologists.

Biologists' Consensus on 'When Life Begins'

Overall, 95% of all biologists affirmed the biological view that a human's life begins at fertilization (5212 out of 5502).

HUMAN LIFE is overwhelmingly recognized by BIOLOGISTS as beginning at conception - disciples of the culture of death ignore science and come up with convoluted excuses to continue the slaughter.

The "Party of Science" seems awfully confused these days about basic biology.

[JimL]

When you say "not usually referred to", you're excluding a very high number of actual biologists.

Biologists' Consensus on 'When Life Begins'

Overall, 95% of all biologists affirmed the biological view that a human's life begins at fertilization (5212 out of 5502).

HUMAN LIFE is overwhelmingly recognized by BIOLOGISTS as beginning at conception - disciples of the culture of death ignore science and come up with convoluted excuses to continue the slaughter.

You're confusing human life with a HUMAN BEING. A fetus is human life, in a sense, but it is not a human being.

[Cow Poke]

Are you purposely being dishonest here, or are you simply demonstrating some more of your profound ignorance of all things Southern Baptist? Criswell was President of the SBC from 1968-1970.

You can't even get your facts straight. By "the time of the ruling", Criswell had already been out of office for 3 years.

Further, Criswell preached that you were lost and going to Hell without receiving Christ as Savior. You embrace that, too, yes?

[Cow Poke]

You're confusing human life with a HUMAN BEING. A fetus is human life, in a sense, but it is not a human being.

No, I'm not. If it's not a HUMAN BEING when it began it's life, what type of "being" is it? The deceptive word games that abortion activists use is "person" as opposed to "human being".

From the cite I provided...

Overall, 95% of all biologists affirmed the biological view that a human's life begins at fertilization (5212 out of 5502).

[lilpixieofterror]

You're confusing human life with a HUMAN BEING. A fetus is human life, in a sense, but it is not a human being.