Will The Global Warming Hysterics Never Tire Of Being Wrong?

[seer]

Well as politicians, they certainly need the 7 toilets.

ouch...

[Cow Poke]

Well as politicians, they certainly need the 7 toilets.

It's EIGHT bathrooms, and what makes you think they're all single-holers?

[rogue06]

It's EIGHT bathrooms, and what makes you think they're all single-holers?

You made me think of this:

00000000000000ab000-00aag.jpg

[Cow Poke]

You made me think of this:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]39386[/ATTACH]

I'm kinda inspiring that way.

[JimL]

You made me think of this:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]39386[/ATTACH]

Certainly an apropos symbol for the politicians you support, i.e. the GOP.

[Teallaura]

Certainly an apropos symbol for the politicians you support, i.e. the GOP.

Reminds me more of the Democrats...


article-urn_publicid_ap.org_d6257c46361043f7bd2ee4f7c3c3d8f6-4zK01FBBLD7e1ca292fb98de7272-255_63.jpg

[JimL]

Reminds me more of the Democrats...


[ATTACH=CONFIG]39401[/ATTACH]

Dumb.

[Teallaura]

Dumb.

You're right - they are.

[Tassman]

You're right - they are.

Well not everyone can be an "extremely stable genius" like the 'orange one' claims to be.

[Cow Poke]

Well not everyone can be an "extremely stable genius" like the 'orange one' claims to be.

That would certainly include you, Tass.

[Mountain Man]

Yeah I remember when he once said:



That was three mansions ago.

As I've said before, a multi-millionaire who becomes a politician doesn't bother me nearly as much as those politicians who become multiple-millionaires.

[Leonhard]

Fine - but this won't get anything actually done.

What's the point of this argument? My point was that I consider you a smart cookie, and I shouldn't have to appeal to your emotions in order to make a point.

Actually, it's fairly new here - thanks to Obama.

*shrugs*

Capitalism.

[shunyadragon]

Good thing the name calling rhetoric is in Civics it it not worthy of being in Natural Sciences.

[Teallaura]

What's the point of this argument? My point was that I consider you a smart cookie, and I shouldn't have to appeal to your emotions in order to make a point.

Beats me - I have no idea why you want to debate global whatsis in Civics and not address the elephant in the room that is policy - if it needs to be changed - happens in the political arena. Ignoring politics is like shooting your (general) own foot if you truly believe humans are causing and can affect this supposed problem.

Ignoring the political isn't 'not appealing to emotion' - it's not attempting to make meaningful change.

FYI: It also hurts the argument - if I (general) don't have the ability to weed through the science then I (still general) have to weed through who I trust. Government employees who scream 'denier' at me (still general) aren't likely to figure high on that list.

*shrugs*

Capitalism.

No, socialism.

[Teallaura]

Good thing the name calling rhetoric is in Civics it it not worthy of being in Natural Sciences.

Nat Sci doesn't do anything BUT ad hom fallacy - all day, every day!