Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
The Mueller Report
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by JimLamebrain View PostAs I pointed out to seer, since Mueller believed that he could not indict, many disagree with that assessment, then he also believed that he could not charge, since the accused would not be able to defend himself. He left it to Congress and to Congress it will go, regardless of his unelected toadie, Atty Gen Barr's lie, that there was absolutely no evidence of collusion or obstruction. That was a flat out lie, and the report itself establishes that fact.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostWhether or not Mueller believed he could indict is irrelevant because he could have still recommended it, or said plainly that the president was guilty of obstruction of justice without addressing the question of indictment, but he didn't. Instead, he openly admitted that "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime" with regards to obstruction.
Comment
-
I'm not second guessing anything. I'm simply stating what Mueller did and didn't do. And what he didn't do was charge Trump with a crime, or recommend that Trump be charged with crime, nor did he plainly say that Trump was guilty of committing a crime. What he did do is say that "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime".Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostI'm not second guessing anything. I'm simply stating what Mueller did and didn't do. And what he didn't do was charge Trump with a crime, or recommend that Trump be charged with crime, nor did he plainly say that Trump was guilty of committing a crime. What he did do is say that "this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime".
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostAnd you have the Washington Post correspondent Philip Bump now bizarrely proclaiming in a Tweet that...The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostAs I pointed out to seer, since Mueller believed that he could not indict, many disagree with that assessment, then he also believed that he could not charge, since the accused would not be able to defend himself. He left it to Congress and to Congress it will go, regardless of his unelected toadie, Atty Gen Barr's lie, that there was absolutely no evidence of collusion or obstruction. That was a flat out lie, and the report itself establishes that fact.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostDoes anybody remember Jimmy disparaging other Attorneys General, like Loretta Lynch or Eric Holder as political hacks or "unelected toadies"?
Imagine the reaction if Trump had described William Barr as his "wingman."
Imagine the reaction if Donald Jr. or Jared Kushner had a secret meeting with Barr on the tarmac of an airport in which the Secret Service detail was told to step outside while they talked supposedly only about golf and grandkids.
Yeah, little jimmy is just another left wing hypocrite
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
Originally posted by dirtfloor View PostHe also said that if he had concluded that Trump had not committed obstruction, he would have said so.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by firstfloor View PostThe point is that the evidence of obstruction is very strong. It appears that Trump was saved by the doctrine that a sitting President cannot be indicted.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View Post[ATTACH=CONFIG]36496[/ATTACH]
Imagine the reaction if Trump had described William Barr as his "wingman."
Imagine the reaction if Donald Jr. or Jared Kushner had a secret meeting with Barr on the tarmac of an airport in which the Secret Service detail was told to step outside while they talked supposedly only about golf and grandkids.
Yeah, little jimmy is just another left wing hypocrite
Eric Holder: 'I'm still the president's wingman'
JimL is now having a heart attack.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
June 27, 2016 - Lynch and former President Clinton have a private meeting on an airport tarmac in Phoenix. Clinton boards Lynch's plane and the two talk for half an hour. The encounter raises eyebrows because the FBI is investigating Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server to store government documents during her tenure as secretary of state. Although Lynch denies discussing anything substantive with the former president, she later says that she regrets the encounter. She adds that she will accept whatever recommendations the FBI makes once the agency concludes its Clinton probe. Some Republican lawmakers suggest that Lynch should recuse herself from the investigation.
Talk about COLLUSION!!!! Jimmy is absolutely LIVID!!!!The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostIt would be more like evidence of ATTEMPTED obstruction - where he was accused, but not found guilty, of a totally different offense.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...r-trump-226664
Comment
-
Originally posted by firstfloor View PostThe point is that the evidence of obstruction is very strong.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seanD, Yesterday, 05:54 PM
|
0 responses
17 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
Yesterday, 05:54 PM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 05-14-2024, 09:50 PM
|
55 responses
246 views
1 like
|
Last Post
by Stoic
Yesterday, 08:49 PM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 05-14-2024, 04:03 AM
|
25 responses
126 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Yesterday, 11:21 AM | ||
Started by carpedm9587, 05-13-2024, 12:51 PM
|
133 responses
791 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by carpedm9587
Yesterday, 09:15 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, 05-13-2024, 06:47 AM
|
5 responses
47 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by mossrose
05-13-2024, 12:18 PM
|
Comment