Originally posted by JimL
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
No Collusion!
Collapse
X
-
That's what
- She
Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
- Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)
I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
- Stephen R. Donaldson
-
As I said in my first post,No Evidence = Not guilty.
Let's try it this way, JimL and Tass are criminals I being the prosecutor have no evidence of their Crimes against humanity. But I can't prove that they did not commit the crimes either, but a lot of people said they did, So until I can prove them innocent we will assume that they are guilty. This is the system that JimL and Tass are using.
Tass, again we have a good example of the "Gish-Gallop" style of writing.
The Mueller team is speaking to powers it does not have and making it sound like it's their right to use the powers.
They are also speaking as both the prosecution and defense.
There was no evidence of Obstruction of Justice because the investigation was never interfered with(Intent is not actual Obstruction.)Last edited by The Pendragon; 04-30-2019, 12:11 PM."Any sufficiently advanced technology, is indistinguishable from Magic!"-- Arthur C. Clark
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostEven the republicans favorite judge and Fox news legal analyst, Judge Nepolitano, disagrees with you regarding obstruction. That you can't see or understand the evidence is on you. And btw, you don't understand how impeachment works either, it's a political proceeding, not criminal proceeding. Anyone with a brain can see what the president has done and is doing with regaeds to collusion, conspiracy, and obstruction, not to mention the undermining of our democratic Institutions. Congress, and the american people will ultimately decide what to do about it, not a criminal court.Last edited by The Pendragon; 04-30-2019, 01:37 PM."Any sufficiently advanced technology, is indistinguishable from Magic!"-- Arthur C. Clark
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Pendragon View PostChallenge to you and Tass: Give me your evidence of collusion, conspiracy, obstruction outside of the Mueller report (because Mueller already admitted that he did not have legal standing.) If you can do that I will listen to your bloviating. But, please no hearsay, and provide Documents, Emails and the like as documentation.
As for the undermining of our democratic Institutions:
What Institutions have been undermined?
Not agreeing with policies is not undermining.
You might want to stay clear of racism claims, because I will prove that the claims of racism against Trump are actually liberals and the press being racist, not Trump.
Last edited by RumTumTugger; 04-30-2019, 01:45 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tassmoron View PostBased on the facts and the applicable legal standardsSome may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Pendragon View PostAs I said in my first post, ...The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Not to waste a lot of time I will give you one instance of conspiracy to see if you have enough objectivity to admit to it. P.Manafort, Trumps campaign manager, gave the campaigns internal polling data and geographical targeting data to a Russian Operative, a foriegn adversary, in order that they focus their electoral interference campaign in those critical states in order to win the electoral college for their man Trump. Is that conspiracy in your opinion? And btw, there is a whole lot more corrupt activity than that!Last edited by JimL; 05-02-2019, 09:11 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostNot to waste a lot of time I will give you one instance of conspiracy to see if you have enough objectivity to admit to it. P.Manafort, Trumps campaign manager, gave the campaigns internal polling data and geographical targeting data to a Russian Operative, a foriegn adversary, in order that they focus their electoral interference campaign in those critical states in order to win the electoral college for their man Trump. Is that conspiracy in your opinion? And btw, there is a whole lot more corrupt activity than that!
Are you telling me that we need to Lock up Mueller and his team?
Mueller put it plainly in his report he could not find Collusion without Collusion there can't be conspiracy.
I will repeat this again, because it seem your a little slow and it takes you and Tass 3 or more times before you understand (Please don't make me post this again it just makes you two look dense). Mueller was clear that he could not find any collusion or conspiracy between the Trump Campaign and the Russians (or any American). I know this is hard for you JimL But "NO means NO".
Do you trust Mueller or not?
If you don't trust Mueller how can you trust the report?
If you do trust Mueller why don't you trust him when he see "NO COLLUSION"?
I guess I have to be clearer when I ask you things, you I thought you where smarter then you are, I should have said "outside of the Mueller Investigation" I just figured that the report covered the investigation.
Do you have any evidence that Mueller did not know about?Last edited by The Pendragon; 05-02-2019, 11:10 AM."Any sufficiently advanced technology, is indistinguishable from Magic!"-- Arthur C. Clark
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostWhen dealing with Tassman, it will take far more posts than a first one, and even then, he'll just double down on saying the same thing over and over and accusing you of not answering him. He's wired funny that way."Any sufficiently advanced technology, is indistinguishable from Magic!"-- Arthur C. Clark
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Pendragon View PostJimL, is afflicted by the same malfunction as Tass.That's what
- She
Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
- Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)
I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
- Stephen R. Donaldson
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostNot to waste a lot of time I will give you one instance of conspiracy to see if you have enough objectivity to admit to it. P.Manafort, Trumps campaign manager, gave the campaigns internal polling data and geographical targeting data to a Russian Operative, a foriegn adversary, in order that they focus their electoral interference campaign in those critical states in order to win the electoral college for their man Trump. Is that conspiracy in your opinion? And btw, there is a whole lot more corrupt activity than that!
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostMaybe Mueller overlooked that. Oh wait. He devoted an entire section to Manafort sharing polling information with a Ukrainian (not Russian) operative and concluded that neither Trump nor his campaign were colluding with anyoneSome may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostAgain, prosecutors don't exonerate. The "applicable legal standard" referred to is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, which Mueller didn't have, and AG Barr and DAG Rosenstein affirmed Mueller's decision not to pursue indictment.
JimMy brethren, do not hold your faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ with an attitude of personal favoritism. James 2:1
If anyone thinks himself to be religious, and yet does not bridle his tongue but deceives his own heart, this man’s religion is worthless James 1:26
This you know, my beloved brethren. But everyone must be quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger; James 1:19
Comment
-
Originally posted by oxmixmudd View PostDo you suppose Mueller made that statement for no purpose? Can you look at that statement and truly assume it meant nothing? If it meant something, what do you suppose it meant if not that There is evidence of a problem, but not enough to charge him with a crime?
Jim
As it has been explained to you and others before, when a prosecutor declines to press charges, anything else he might have to say about the matter is irrelevant.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Cow Poke, Today, 04:44 AM
|
10 responses
55 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Stoic
Today, 06:44 PM
|
||
Started by Ronson, Yesterday, 03:40 PM
|
9 responses
60 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Today, 08:03 AM | ||
Started by Sparko, Yesterday, 09:33 AM
|
16 responses
75 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Today, 12:27 PM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, Yesterday, 09:11 AM
|
45 responses
214 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cow Poke
Today, 05:53 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 08:03 AM
|
10 responses
59 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cow Poke
Yesterday, 01:42 PM
|
Comment