Originally posted by carpedm9587
View Post
And when you add the rest of the bill - which clearly states that the baby must be non-viable, or the woman's life must be in jeopardy, and requires consulting physicians to agree that one of these two conditions has been met...well... the article is grossly misleading.
Indeed, all the law appears to do is amend an existing law to add "non-viable fetus" to the list of reasons for the late-term abortion. All of this "hype" is trying to paint a picture where a healthy woman can abort a healthy infant as it emerges from between her legs "just because she wants to." Nothing could be further from the truth.
And I notice that no one has actually answered the question asked: does anyone here think that some 58% of their neighbors and fellow citizens are functioning sociopaths?
Indeed, all the law appears to do is amend an existing law to add "non-viable fetus" to the list of reasons for the late-term abortion. All of this "hype" is trying to paint a picture where a healthy woman can abort a healthy infant as it emerges from between her legs "just because she wants to." Nothing could be further from the truth.
And I notice that no one has actually answered the question asked: does anyone here think that some 58% of their neighbors and fellow citizens are functioning sociopaths?
Comment