Originally posted by oxmixmudd
View Post
And the cold hard fact it, it may not be enough. There may not be a way in a society that devalues human life, that puts one's own needs above everyone elses, that pretends common decency is weakness, that mocks others just for the fun of it (sound like any people you know posting on this board?) to stop mass shooting without a repeal of the 2nd amendment. That may very well be the choice.
We live with constantly increasing carnage year over year, month over month, or we recognize we are not a people worthy of having unfettered access to guns and we pull back from that. That times have changed and there is no way to have an unregulated potential militia as a protection against an invasion in an age of machine guns, tanks and atom bombs.
OTOH, those of you that are so concerned about your 'right' to own a gun that you are willing to fight any and all efforts to curb the carnage have the blood of those killed on your hands.
Jim
Jim
I have a friend who's an ex-marine. He once told me that other countries are afraid to invade the US (a la "Red Dawn") because they know that so many Americans are armed. Just parading down the street would be a massacre for them. Numbers matter in a battle. Superior weapons have a definite advantage, but are by no means decisive.
We feel those of you who want to curb OUR ability to fight back as the one's having blood on their hands. Notice that most of these shooting happen in gun free zones? There's a reason for that.
Comment