Time To Smear Kavanaugh's Good Name...

[Cerebrum123]

One of my infamous asides....


I was once accused of having an affair with a young woman named Kendall in our congregation. An older woman who lived down the street started the rumor that this young woman's car was often seen at my house for hours on end while my wife's car was not there.

As it turned out, this young woman and my wife were in business together, so Kendall would come park at our house, then ride with my wife to the various venues where they were doing event planning.

Kendall's husband, Bobby, sang in our choir, and was always right behind me when I was preaching. When he heard about this, he came to me and said.... "I have an idea -- next Sunday, you stand in the pulpit and tell the congregation you want to confess that you were, indeed, having an affair, but it wasn't with Kendall --- it was with ME!" He said, he would then step out of the choir and stand beside me and we could stand there hugging it out.

Yeah, no.

Yeah, a bad idea, but funny to hear.

[lilpixieofterror]

Should rape victims and their allies not try hard to stop criminals from prospering?

Should people be accused of crimes there is no evidence they committed, with their families and careers targeted for destruction if no evidence of guilt is found? We have an innocent till proven guilty justice system for a reason, unless you care to live with the reality that at any point in time, you can be targeted for destruction by the social justice mob for a crime there is no evidence you committed.

[Psychic Missile]

Should people be accused of crimes there is no evidence they committed, with their families and careers targeted for destruction if none is found?

If they did indeed commit those crimes, yes. Even if a victim doesn't have evidence, their accusation can help possible future victims and should indeed harm the criminal's livelihood.

[Littlejoe]

So the fact that she couldn't keep her own story straight (was it 1, 2, or 4 guys that attacked her?), that her own witnesses refuted her, that she lied about being afraid of flying, that she lied about when and why she added a second door to her house, and so on, means nothing to you?

And, no, Kavanaugh did not lie about who he was I'm high school. He openly admitted that he liked to party. That doesn't make him a rapist.

Point of order, even Ford admitted there was no rape. He allegedly groped her and tried to take her clothes off, but couldn't.

[lilpixieofterror]

If they did indeed commit those crimes, yes. Even if a victim doesn't have evidence, their accusation can help possible future victims and should indeed harm the criminal's livelihood.

[rogue06]

Well yes. He was a drunk and party animal in high school and college. There have been multiple witnesses to that fact. Several has testified that he becomes belligerent when drunk. Ergo it is very possible an incident like the one described could have happened and he either doesn't remember it or isn't admitting it.

Playing the game that you're offering here, it is possible that he rejected advances she made having no interest in her and she's been holding a grudge ever since and finally had the opportunity to get her revenge. Sheesh. You're stretching mighty far here by weaving a web of what ifs to hold on to a story from someone who's credibility has started to unravel faster and faster what with her claims about the reason a second door was added to her house turning out to be as bogus as her claims she was afraid of flying (so she didn't want to come to D.C.) while regularly flying all over the place including overseas.

[rogue06]

Gee, ya think?

It'll be a "monster" of their own creation and one richly deserved.

[rogue06]

Should rape victims and their allies not try hard to stop criminals from prospering?

Who was raped here? And if there is not a bit of credible evidence against someone should we just say, well since I don't like the man who nominated him so he needs to be destroyed anyways regardless of guilt or innocence?

[rogue06]

I've said multiple times that justice is not dispensed based on probability but on the evidence. Not only is there no evidence to support Ford's accusation, the evidence that does exist contradicts her, including her own shifting narrative to her therapist, in her letter, and finally in her testimony.

Based on the EVIDENCE, not only can we reasonably conclude that her accusation is false but that she knows it's false.

I think someone recently mentioned that something like 66% of folks charged with a crime and brought to court are found guilty, so then why don't we just dispense with the trial altogether being that most will be found guilty they all are therefore guilty.

[One Bad Pig]

It'll be a "monster" of their own creation and one richly deserved.

Not that I think it'll actually have much impact. He does do a pretty good job of being impartial, from what I recall.

[Mountain Man]

Not that I think it'll actually have much impact. He does do a pretty good job of being impartial, from what I recall.

That was before the Democrats gave him good reason to utterly loath liberals.

[Mountain Man]

Democrats are furious that the FBI couldn't find anything on Kavanaugh. Now they're accusing them of a cover-up.

https://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ham-whitewash/

[Cow Poke]

If they did indeed commit those crimes, yes. Even if a victim doesn't have evidence, their accusation can help possible future victims and should indeed harm the criminal's livelihood.

And if it's a false accusation, it really hurts people who have legitimate complaints.

[One Bad Pig]

That was before the Democrats gave him good reason to utterly loath liberals.

He'll still be a strict constructionist, though.

[seer]

Kavanaugh's op-ed, today

https://www.wsj.com/articles/i-am-an...dge-1538695822