Time To Smear Kavanaugh's Good Name...

[carpedm9587]

Actually, it's the truth lovers club, but not surprising you would not grasp that.

So tempting....

[Cow Poke]

Now that's a lie if I ever heard one. You're a Trump supporter, the truth lovers club!

So, in incorrectly declaring something a lie, you tell an actual lie. Good job.

[Mountain Man]

Hmm, me thinks I've stumbled into the women haters club?

You didn't say the password. Get out.

[Tassman]

Limited in scope can mean the time limit that was agreed to by the Democrats.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevede.../#38e3ed11877c

[Mountain Man]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevede.../#38e3ed11877c

So they're trying to charge Justice Kavanaugh with being justifiably upset that his name was being smeared with malicious lies? And they're trying to claim that this was somehow unethical?

Then there's this line buried at the bottom of the article: "Supreme Court justices are not subject to the misconduct rules governing these claims."

Much ado about nothing...

[Sparko]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevede.../#38e3ed11877c

It says nothing about him doubting anything. It was a procedural letter transferring complaints to the proper venue in response to a request.

https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/intranet/home.nsf/Content/Announcement+-+Letter+from+Chief+Justice+Roberts+Transferring+Ju dicial+Misconduct+Complaints+Filed+Against+Former+ Circuit+Judge+Brett+Kavanaugh+to+the+Tenth+Circuit/$FILE/Ltr%20to%20Chief%20Judge%20Tymkovich%20Oct%2010%20 2018.pdf

Dear Chief Judge Tymkovich:

October 10, 2018

On September 20, 2018, I received a request from the Judicial Council of the
District of Columbia Circuit, under Rule 26 of the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and
Judicial-Disability Proceedings, to transfer judicial conduct proceedings captioned In re:
Judicial Misconduct Complaint, Nos. 18-90029, 18-90034, and 18-90044, to the judicial
council of another federal judicial circuit.

On September 26, 2018, I received requests to transfer related proceedings Nos.
18-90043, 18-90055, and 18-90059; on September 28, related proceedings Nos. 18-90060
and 18-90064; on October 3, related proceeding No. 18-90065; and on October 5, related
proceedings Nos. 18-90066 through 18-90071.

In response, I have selected the Judicial Council of the United States Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit to accept the transfer and to exercise the powers of a
judicial council with respect to the identified complaints and any pending or new
complaints relating to the same subject matter.

[One Bad Pig]

So they're trying to charge Justice Kavanaugh with being justifiably upset that his name was being smeared with malicious lies? And they're trying to claim that this was somehow unethical?

Then there's this line buried at the bottom of the article: "Supreme Court justices are not subject to the misconduct rules governing these claims."

Much ado about nothing...

...and while there are legitimate cases of judicial misconduct, many of the complaints stem from sore losers.

[Cow Poke]

So, where are all the liberals demanding that we "believe the women"?

source

[Mountain Man]

Like I said, Ford and her attorneys have to be breathing a big sigh of relief that their names have not been added to any congressional inquiries. Ramirez, too.

[Cow Poke]

Like I said, Ford and her attorneys have to be breathing a big sigh of relief that their names have not been added to any congressional inquiries. Ramirez, too.

Yet.

[DesertBerean]

I really want to tell Feinstein off. But she just might be kicked out of office over this so that may be moot.

[Tassman]

So they're trying to charge Justice Kavanaugh with being justifiably upset that his name was being smeared with malicious lies?

And they're trying to claim that this was somehow unethical?

Well Judge Henderson concluded that more than a dozen complaints against Kavanaugh were substantive enough to warrant investigation by an impartial panel.

Then there's this line buried at the bottom of the article: "Supreme Court justices are not subject to the misconduct rules governing these claims."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevede.../#50ceaa8f1877

[Sparko]

Well the blowback from the way the Senate treated Kavanaugh was the reason why the Senate shifted more to the right after the election last night. People were really upset with the way he was treated.

[rogue06]

Well the blowback from the way the Senate treated Kavanaugh was the reason why the Senate shifted more to the right after the election last night. People were really upset with the way he was treated.

That is the CW.

[JimL]

Well the blowback from the way the Senate treated Kavanaugh was the reason why the Senate shifted more to the right after the election last night. People were really upset with the way he was treated.

No, people weren't upset, you bone heads were upset at the way Kavanaugh was treated because asking him questions and investigating accussations against him was just too much for you people to handle. The reason the Senate shifted by a few Senaters is because Senate seats were in relatively red states which are getting bluer each year. In the next election it will be Senate republican seats up for grabs. Democrat candidates got more votes in this election than republicans got in their big wave election of 2010. Florida is still up for grabs and Ted Cruz just barely eked it out in Texas of all places. Things are a changin, it just takes a little time, we'll be rid of the conservative knuckleheads, not soon enough, but soon.