Originally posted by Cow Poke
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Time To Smear Kavanaugh's Good Name...
Collapse
X
-
The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy...returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Martin Luther King
I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong. Frederick Douglas
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostNow that's a lie if I ever heard one. You're a Trump supporter, the truth lovers club!The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimLamebrain View PostHmm, me thinks I've stumbled into the women haters club?Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostLimited in scope can mean the time limit that was agreed to by the Democrats.
Interestingly, on top of this, Chief Justice Roberts also seems to have doubts about Kavanaugh’s fitness to sit on the Supreme Court. He has requested the Tenth Circuit to investigate Kavanaugh ethics questions
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevede.../#38e3ed11877c“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassmoron View PostInterestingly, on top of this, Chief Justice Roberts also seems to have doubts about Kavanaugh’s fitness to sit on the Supreme Court. He has requested the Tenth Circuit to investigate Kavanaugh ethics questions
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevede.../#38e3ed11877c
Then there's this line buried at the bottom of the article: "Supreme Court justices are not subject to the misconduct rules governing these claims."
Much ado about nothing...Last edited by Mountain Man; 11-06-2018, 06:08 AM.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostProbably not given that the Democrats were concerned by the unresolved questions relating to the dozens of others named by the accusers which were simply bypassed. An incomplete enquiry, when some avenues are simply ignored, cannot be considered conclusive.
Interestingly, on top of this, Chief Justice Roberts also seems to have doubts about Kavanaugh’s fitness to sit on the Supreme Court. He has requested the Tenth Circuit to investigate Kavanaugh ethics questions
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevede.../#38e3ed11877c
https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/intranet/home.nsf/Content/Announcement+-+Letter+from+Chief+Justice+Roberts+Transferring+Ju dicial+Misconduct+Complaints+Filed+Against+Former+ Circuit+Judge+Brett+Kavanaugh+to+the+Tenth+Circuit/$FILE/Ltr%20to%20Chief%20Judge%20Tymkovich%20Oct%2010%20 2018.pdf
Dear Chief Judge Tymkovich:
October 10, 2018
On September 20, 2018, I received a request from the Judicial Council of the
District of Columbia Circuit, under Rule 26 of the Rules for Judicial-Conduct and
Judicial-Disability Proceedings, to transfer judicial conduct proceedings captioned In re:
Judicial Misconduct Complaint, Nos. 18-90029, 18-90034, and 18-90044, to the judicial
council of another federal judicial circuit.
On September 26, 2018, I received requests to transfer related proceedings Nos.
18-90043, 18-90055, and 18-90059; on September 28, related proceedings Nos. 18-90060
and 18-90064; on October 3, related proceeding No. 18-90065; and on October 5, related
proceedings Nos. 18-90066 through 18-90071.
In response, I have selected the Judicial Council of the United States Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit to accept the transfer and to exercise the powers of a
judicial council with respect to the identified complaints and any pending or new
complaints relating to the same subject matter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostSo they're trying to charge Justice Kavanaugh with being justifiably upset that his name was being smeared with malicious lies? And they're trying to claim that this was somehow unethical?
Then there's this line buried at the bottom of the article: "Supreme Court justices are not subject to the misconduct rules governing these claims."
Much ado about nothing...Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom
Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
So, where are all the liberals demanding that we "believe the women"?
Democrats insist we must “believe women” regardless of the facts, evidence — or lack thereof — when the rest of us smell a rat.
On Friday one of Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s accusers, Judy Munro Leighton — a left-wing activist who opposed his nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court — admitted to congressional investigators she made up the lurid back seat rape tale as “a tactic” and to get attention. She now admits she’s never even met Kavanaugh. She, along with Julie Swetnick and lawyer Michael Avenatti, are all subject to criminal referrals by the Senate Judiciary Committee on allegations of false sexual misconduct charges.
These are the despicable frauds that Democrat lawmakers insisted we believe.
source
The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Like I said, Ford and her attorneys have to be breathing a big sigh of relief that their names have not been added to any congressional inquiries. Ramirez, too.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostLike I said, Ford and her attorneys have to be breathing a big sigh of relief that their names have not been added to any congressional inquiries. Ramirez, too.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
I really want to tell Feinstein off. But she just might be kicked out of office over this so that may be moot.Watch your links! http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/fa...corumetiquette
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostSo they're trying to charge Justice Kavanaugh with being justifiably upset that his name was being smeared with malicious lies?
And they're trying to claim that this was somehow unethical?
Then there's this line buried at the bottom of the article: "Supreme Court justices are not subject to the misconduct rules governing these claims."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevede.../#50ceaa8f1877“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostWell the blowback from the way the Senate treated Kavanaugh was the reason why the Senate shifted more to the right after the election last night. People were really upset with the way he was treated.
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostWell the blowback from the way the Senate treated Kavanaugh was the reason why the Senate shifted more to the right after the election last night. People were really upset with the way he was treated.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by little_monkey, Yesterday, 04:19 PM
|
16 responses
119 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by One Bad Pig
Today, 11:55 AM
|
||
Started by whag, 03-26-2024, 04:38 PM
|
53 responses
319 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Today, 11:32 AM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 03-26-2024, 11:45 AM
|
25 responses
111 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Today, 08:36 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 09:21 AM
|
33 responses
196 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Roy
Today, 07:43 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 08:34 AM
|
84 responses
360 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by JimL
Today, 11:08 AM
|
Comment