Shooting At Newspaper

[Cow Poke]

So what, your assertion that Trumps propaganda war against the media had nothing to do with this mental cases decision to carry out this attack is unfounded.

I actually made no such assertion. I just opted not to ASSUME something not in evidence.

You have no idea one way or the other if Trumps rhetoric triggered the nut!

There is nothing to suggest it did, but this will not prevent you from nuttering your own goofy accusations. Until there is at least some kind of EVIDENCE that "the nut" was prompted by Trump, I'll stick with those FACT thingies.

[RumTumTugger]

Occurred, yes.



This, of course, would be your own nutter version, unsupported by fact.



Thank you, Jim, for providing your own nutter's beef, but I hope you don't mind if I go with actual reporting of facts instead of your nutter conspiracy theories..



Did ya get that part about the newspaper's legal department deciding not to press charges because they were afraid it would exasperate (that means make much worse) an already flammable situation?

CP how unfair of you to bring facts into a discussion JimL, Tass and Starlight want feelings to Trump Facts.

[JimL]

Occurred, yes.



This, of course, would be your own nutter version, unsupported by fact.



Thank you, Jim, for providing your own nutter's beef, but I hope you don't mind if I go with actual reporting of facts instead of your nutter conspiracy theories..



Did ya get that part about the newspaper's legal department deciding not to press charges because they were afraid it would exasperate (that means make much worse) an already flammable situation?

So what, your assertion that Trumps propaganda war against the media had nothing to do with this mental cases decision to carry out this attack is unfounded. You have no idea one way or the other if Trumps rhetoric triggered the nut!

[Cow Poke]

The nutters beef with the paper occured well before Trump,

Occurred, yes.

his decision to murder journalists that had nothing to do with the beef he had with the paper

This, of course, would be your own nutter version, unsupported by fact.

didn't occcur until after Trumps propaganda war against the media.

Thank you, Jim, for providing your own nutter's beef, but I hope you don't mind if I go with actual reporting of facts instead of your nutter conspiracy theories..



Did ya get that part about the newspaper's legal department deciding not to press charges because they were afraid it would exasperate (that means make much worse) an already flammable situation?

[JimL]

I should note that it appears that Sean Hannity tried to link the shooting to Maxine Waters' rhetoric which is equally deplorable as the long list of those in the MSM trying to link it to Trump.

You're just too funny, rogue!

[JimL]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]28627[/ATTACH]

That's an apt display for the current base of the republican party, rogue. Deplorable.

[JimL]

Except, of course, for the FACT that this was set in motion well before Trump. But you never seem terribly worried about them thar fact thingies.

The nutters beef with the paper occured well before Trump, his decision to murder journalists that had nothing to do with the beef he had with the paper didn't occcur until after Trumps propaganda war against the media.

[rogue06]

The catalyst was his losing a defamation suit against the paper. Trump had no more to do with it than Obama did when his Administration declared that they would treat Fox News "like an opponent" tried to ban their participation in press conferences and went after James Rosen. Or Nixon when he actively went after the press having his enemies in the media audited. Or Lincoln when he suspended habeas corpus and closed down more than 300 newspapers that opposed his policies, jailing editors and reporters. Or the original "Fake News" president Thomas Jefferson when he proclaimed that "Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle."

Sheesh.

I should note that it appears that Sean Hannity tried to link the shooting to Maxine Waters' rhetoric which is equally deplorable as the long list of those in the MSM trying to link it to Trump.

[rogue06]

Yes, but Trump might be the catalyst.

The catalyst was his losing a defamation suit against the paper. Trump had no more to do with it than Obama did when his Administration declared that they would treat Fox News "like an opponent" tried to ban their participation in press conferences and went after James Rosen. Or Nixon when he actively went after the press having his enemies in the media audited. Or Lincoln when he suspended habeas corpus and closed down more than 300 newspapers that opposed his policies, jailing editors and reporters. Or the original "Fake News" president Thomas Jefferson when he proclaimed that "Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle."

Sheesh.

[Cow Poke]

Yes, but Trump might be the catalyst.

At least, you hope.

[firstfloor]

Except, of course, for the FACT that this was set in motion well before Trump. But you never seem terribly worried about them thar fact thingies.

Yes, but Trump might be the catalyst.

[Mountain Man]

Trump isn't exactly the first person to have an outspoken negative view of the mainstream media. Pundits like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity have been doing it for decades. May as well blame them for the shooting, too.

[Mountain Man]

He has been calling them "the enemy of the American people" though.

So?

[rogue06]

00000000000000ars1c.jpg

[One Bad Pig]

Have you considered seeking psychiatric help?