This story is just breaking:
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
SCOTUS & gay wedding cakes
Collapse
X
-
SCOTUS & gay wedding cakes
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --TassmanTags: None
-
Finally, some sanity!Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostThe ruling was 7-2? Wow. So much for "the conservative court...."
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostThe ruling was 7-2? Wow. So much for "the conservative court...."Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
OK, this is weird. CNN says it was a "narrow ruling", and "6 - 2". Even that can't be called a "narrow ruling".
Washington (CNN)The Supreme Court ruled narrowly in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a cake to celebrate the marriage of a same sex couple because of a religious objections.
The ruling was 6-2.
Since the article says it's subject to change, I'll add a screenshot.
cnn cake.jpgThe first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
I have read some of the majority opinion - it is narrow in that you just can't refuse to serve anyone who comes into the shop. But you can on special orders that require further artistice work by the owner if it violates his religious beliefs. Pretty much what we have arguing here.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostOK, this is weird. CNN says it was a "narrow ruling", and "6 - 2". Even that can't be called a "narrow ruling".
Washington (CNN)The Supreme Court ruled narrowly in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a cake to celebrate the marriage of a same sex couple because of a religious objections.
The ruling was 6-2.
Since the article says it's subject to change, I'll add a screenshot.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]28094[/ATTACH]
ETA: And so is the Chicago Tribune and CNBC (the latter includes a copy of the decision).Last edited by rogue06; 06-04-2018, 09:43 AM.
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostOK, this is weird. CNN says it was a "narrow ruling", and "6 - 2". Even that can't be called a "narrow ruling".
Washington (CNN)The Supreme Court ruled narrowly in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a cake to celebrate the marriage of a same sex couple because of a religious objections.
The ruling was 6-2.
Since the article says it's subject to change, I'll add a screenshot.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]28094[/ATTACH]
cnn cake 2.jpgThe first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostUSA Today, Business Insider, and the New York Times are all also reporting that this "narrow decision" was 7-2.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostI think they mean narrow in how the ruling can be applied.
The ruling, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, is not the wide-ranging ruling on religious liberty that some expected. It is tailored to the case at hand with the justices holding that members of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission showed animus toward Phillips specifically when they suggested his claims of religious freedom was made to justify discrimination.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostI think they mean narrow in how the ruling can be applied.
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostI have read some of the majority opinion - it is narrow in that you just can't refuse to serve anyone who comes into the shop. But you can on special orders that require further artistic work by the owner if it violates his religious beliefs. Pretty much what we have arguing here.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seanD, Today, 04:10 AM
|
19 responses
98 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Ronson
Today, 07:56 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 04:44 AM
|
13 responses
85 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cow Poke
Today, 05:15 AM
|
||
Started by Ronson, 04-30-2024, 03:40 PM
|
10 responses
73 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Roy
Today, 04:58 AM
|
||
Started by Sparko, 04-30-2024, 09:33 AM
|
16 responses
83 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Yesterday, 12:27 PM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 04-30-2024, 09:11 AM
|
82 responses
438 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Today, 03:26 PM
|
Comment