Harvey Weinstein: Another Good Liberal...

[rogue06]

As Democrats denounce Weinstein, Clintons and Obama stay mum

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/09/politi...ein/index.html

If they denounce him then the next step would be to return all of his money.

[Cow Poke]

If they denounce him then the next step would be to return all of his money.

Apparently, they're kinda doing that... They responded by donating money to liberal causes which coincidentally often happen to contribute money to them. Almost like money laundering.

[rogue06]

Apparently, they're kinda doing that... They responded by donating money to liberal causes which coincidentally often happen to contribute money to them. Almost like money laundering.

[JimL]

Yes, I agree, it is ongoing stupid. The stupid just won't end.

(Homework assignment for Jimmy: learn how to use commas; also apostrophes. It should be "it's" and not "its" in this context. )

MM, we are not all anal retentive grammar nerds like a few of you here are. OMG, the humanity, he didn't use an apostrophe!

The fact that nothing has been leaked to the press for months when Mueller's team was leaking like a sieve early on is a pretty good indication that none of those early juicy leads amounted to anything. Even Junior's meeting with the Russian lawyer turned out to be a big bust.

That just shows your ignorance. You won't know what juniors meeting with the Russian lawyer, translator/agent et. al. means until the investigation is over.

[JimL]

no he doesn't. I remember the list Tassy posted. It was hilarious at the transparent attempts to split hairs and nitpick some way to say Trump lied. Hilarious. stuff like he said "all" when it was just "most"

Well, you must really be brainwashed then. I've always wondered how it is that conservatives could be so easily played. Still don't get it exactly, but if you can't admit to yourself of the constant lying from Trump, then it has to be a brainwashing of some sort.

In contrast we have Hillary on record lying outright and contradicting herself.

Yeah, you have the contrast bass ackwards. That video was part of the russian propaganda campaign in support of Trump.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...p-truth-o-met/

Go back and read my posts before the election. I was never a Trump fan. It was Nope and Noper for me.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]24372[/ATTACH]

However when it came down to having to make a choice I had to go with Nope rather than Noper. I wanted Kasich. But once Trump was elected, I was pleasantly surprised that he actually has tried to keep his promises, despite the entire congress fighting him. But I still don't like him as a person. I think he is too juvenile in his trolling of the press and the liberals in twitter and so on. I think he needs to act more presidential. But I do love how he has made you and the other liberals foam at the mouth and twitch. After 8 years of Obama, it's the least you deserve.

I appreciate that, even as a liberal I like and respect J. Kasich and wouldn't have minded so much had he become president. Sorry to have to tell you though, but you went with the noper, not the nope, you dope.

[Darth Executor]

https://twitter.com/janicemin/status/917485536020905984

Weinstein now reduced to begging:

DLuQOsGUIAAgVqM.jpg

[JimL]

https://twitter.com/janicemin/status/917485536020905984

Weinstein now reduced to begging:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]24375[/ATTACH]

Weinstein's obviously guilty, not that I care, but this letter looks like fake news to me.

[Cow Poke]

Weinstein's obviously guilty..

So all the liberal politicians should immediately return the money, right?

[Cow Poke]

Pete and Repete, eh?

[Darth Executor]

Weinstein's obviously guilty, not that I care, but this letter looks like fake news to me.

Hollywoodreporter name dropped multiple individuals claiming they are confirmed to have received the letter (and refused to help Weinstein). Seems strange that they would just make that up and then namedrop people who could easily disprove the claim.

[KingsGambit]

As an aside: I don't quite get the point of returning money other than virtue signalling. Isn't parting bad people of their money basically a good thing?

[Darth Executor]

As an aside: I don't quite get the point of returning money other than virtue signalling. Isn't parting bad people of their money basically a good thing?

Ron Paul tried this with David Duke's money IIRC and it didn't really work out for him. It's a way to claim "I didn't know and I wouldn't have done business with this person if I had" to avoid collateral damage.

[JimL]

So all the liberal politicians should immediately return the money, right?

Why should they, I wouldn't.

[Darth Executor]

Why should they

because it makes no sense to constantly cry about misogyny while profiting from it

[JimL]

because it makes no sense to constantly cry about misogyny while profiting from it

They are not profiting from misogyny, their campaigns have profited from a guy who turns out to have been a misogynyst. Returning it would be stupid, donating it might be a good public relations move to placate the idiots out there that might associate the donation with an acceptance of misogyny. But other than for public relations, the whole idea of returning the monies is ridiculous.