Originally posted by Sparko
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Junior's meeting with Russian lawyer: no smoking gun
Collapse
X
-
"I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
"[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein
-
Originally posted by Dimbulb View PostUm, have you been living in a cave or something? There's been articles about new evidence approximately every week for the last 6 months.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostYes, articles featuring anonymous sources making vague and unverifiable accusations that end up going nowhere."I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
"[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostFirst of all, she wasn't a "Kremlin-linked lawyer"; secondly, there was no indication that the promised information had been acquired illegally, and it turned out she didn't have any information anyway; third, there was no talk in the meeting about Russia supporting the Trump campaign, financially or otherwise. This is is what the evidence shows and is highly significant because liberals have been insisting for months that this meeting was the smoking gun that would finally put Trump away for good. But, like always, it turns out to be much ado about nothing.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/08/u...t.html?mcubz=3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassmoron View PostTrump team met with lawyer linked to Kremlin during campaign and Donald Trump Jr. was promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton before the meeting. Whether or not this eventuated is beside the point. He was nevertheless prepared to accept support from Russia. No doubt the Mueller enquiry will tell us more in due course.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/08/u...t.html?mcubz=3
Which is to say that Veselnitskaya was far from being a top-level insider rubbing shoulders with Putin like the Times article deceptively implies.
And accepting damaging information about an opponent? That's not illegal, provided the information wasn't illegally obtained. The law only forbids financial donations, which is why NBC News recently made a big deal about the word "donations" supposedly appearing in Manafort's meeting notes only to hastily retract the story a few hours later after realizing they had gotten burned by one of their "anonymous" sources.
But seriously, kiddo, if you're so hot and bothered about a US candidate accepting damaging information from a foreign source then when are you going to condemn Hillary for doing exactly that when she colluded with the Ukrainian government and actually used the information against Trump's campaign?
Come on, Tassmoron, when are you going to call for Hillary's proverbial head on a platter?Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostReally, you should know better than to the trust The New York Times.
[cite=NBC News]The Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr. during the presidential campaign denied in an exclusive interview with NBC News that she had any connection to the Kremlin...
Comment
-
I like how you ignored the vast majority of my post which shows that The New York Times is full of crap and that you're a bald-faced hypocrite. Oh, but I'm sure that wasn't your intent.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Starlight View PostUm, have you been living in a cave or something? There's been articles about new evidence approximately every week for the last 6 months.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Postif they had enough evidence they would charge him. No need to continue the investigation other than to add more charges.
But you do make a good point: Since liberals are so hot and bothered about impeaching Trump as soon as possible, and since all they need is one solid piece of evidence linking him to a crime to remove him from office, then why haven't they acted already if the evidence against him is as damning as Dimbulb claims?Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Starlight View PostAre you referring to Breitbarf?Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostThe liberal narrative is that Mueller is going to find everything he possibly can and then drop charges on Trump all at once.
But you do make a good point: Since liberals are so hot and bothered about impeaching Trump as soon as possible, and since all they need is one solid piece of evidence linking him to a crime to remove him from office, then why haven't they acted already if the evidence against him is as damning as Dimbulb claims?Last edited by Tassman; 09-13-2017, 12:32 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostI like how you ignored the vast majority of my post which shows that The New York Times is full of crap and that you're a bald-faced hypocrite. Oh, but I'm sure that wasn't your intent.
The New York Times has long been regarded within the industry as a national "newspaper of record" - Encyclopedia Britannica. This as opposed to your biased rag of choice, namely the Alt-Right 'Breitbart'.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 01:19 PM
|
9 responses
80 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
Yesterday, 11:58 PM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, Yesterday, 12:23 PM
|
55 responses
197 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Today, 10:09 AM | ||
Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 11:46 AM
|
16 responses
125 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Stoic
Yesterday, 04:44 PM
|
||
Started by seer, Yesterday, 04:37 AM
|
23 responses
109 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
Yesterday, 02:49 PM
|
||
Started by seanD, 05-02-2024, 04:10 AM
|
27 responses
158 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
Yesterday, 01:37 PM
|
Comment