WEF Contributor: Trump Win "Likely to Be Deathblow to What Remains" of Globalism

[Cow Poke]

Evidently you have not taken your own advice as you seem unaware that Yuval Noah Harari is an Israeli historian and not a "clown spewing forth his globalist crap".

why-not-both-why-not.gif

[rogue06]

The Slay site is hardly a reliable news source.

Using one right wing and questionable site hardly endorses what seer was alleging in his other thread.

Funny how you avoided the second link which is of "Dr. Evil" himself sitting there clearly and directly telling you exactly what you are so desperate to dismiss as false.

Just the sort of disingenuous duplicity we've come to expect from you.

[Cow Poke]

Just the sort of disingenuous duplicity we've come to expect from you.

You say that like it's a bad thing.

[rogue06]

Then there was the time Klaus bragged about infiltrating the cabinets of world governments. Oh, and the time he talked to Biden and praised him for being one of his most active and loyal assets.

Justin Trudeau was sooo jealous.

[Sparko]

why-not-both-why-not.gif

Yeah but did you even know he was bald? Huh? That proves you have no idea what you were talking about! You don't even know what color his socks are! /HA mode

[Cow Poke]

Yeah but did you even know he was bald? Huh? That proves you have no idea what you were talking about! You don't even know what color his socks are! /HA mode

But it's impossible for a Jewish Historian to know anything at all or have any opinion at all outside Jewish History. Because, well... Old German Cat Lady!

[Sparko]

But it's impossible for a Jewish Historian to know anything at all or have any opinion at all outside Jewish History. Because, well... Old German Cat Lady!

I bet he doesn't even speak Greek!

[Cerebrum123]

Justin Trudeau was sooo jealous.

That wouldn't surprise me in the least.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

Funny how you avoided the second link which is of "Dr. Evil" himself sitting there clearly and directly telling you exactly what you are so desperate to dismiss as false.

I addressed seer's comment per the snippet with Schwab in a separate reply.

Just the sort of disingenuous duplicity we've come to expect from you.

If you had actually read what I had written to both contributors you would have had no need to make that comment. However, we know you do not excel at reading for comprehension, as your citation of Mark A Chancey to support your own contentions so amusingly demonstrated.

[Chaotic Void]

I don't know.... I thought Trump wanted to take over the world? That would promote globalism!

Trump, President of Earth!

Soon, his legacy will live on in the 41st Millennium

God-Emperor Trump.jpg

[Cerebrum123]

Soon, his legacy will live on in the 41st Millennium

God-Emperor Trump.jpg

[rogue06]

I addressed seer's comment per the snippet with Schwab in a separate reply.

If you had actually read what I had written to both contributors you would have had no need to make that comment. However, we know you do not excel at reading for comprehension, as your citation of Mark A Chancey to support your own contentions so amusingly demonstrated.

If you were legitimately addressing seer's comment per the snippet with Schwab then why ignore the link where you could hear Schwab say it for himself and instead attack the reliability of the other source? Given we have a video of him saying what both the article and seer declared he had said that issue was moot.

Instead you deliberately ignored the second link choosing to pretend that the quote was questionable.

But go ahead. Keep digging.

PS: Thanks for reminding me of Chaucey. I'll have to get back to that thread

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

I would recommend Dr Harari's interview to everyone. It has nothing to do with globalism per se but a great deal to do with the potential impact on humans and human society of AI.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

If you were legitimately addressing seer's comment per the snippet with Schwab then why ignore the link where you could hear Schwab say it for himself and instead attack the reliability of the other source? Given we have a video of him saying what both the article and seer declared he had said that issue was moot.

You and others here once again exhibit a complete inability to do basic comprehension . This is what Schwab said- my emphasis

The next step could be to go into a prescriptive mode which means you do not even have to have elections anymore because you can already predict...why do we need elections because we know what the result will be

However, that very short clip does not give us the full context of the discussion which appears to be touching on the technology that is available. The same topic of no longer needing elections comes up in the Harari Bartlett discussion.

So I suspect that that clip was as much a travesty of the Schwab Brin discussion as was the OP clip of the discussion between Bartlett and Harari.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

If you were legitimately addressing seer's comment per the snippet with Schwab then why ignore the link where you could hear Schwab say it for himself and instead attack the reliability of the other source? Given we have a video of him saying what both the article and seer declared he had said that issue was moot.

Instead you deliberately ignored the second link choosing to pretend that the quote was questionable.

But go ahead. Keep digging.

PS: Thanks for reminding me of Chaucey. I'll have to get back to that thread

I would also point out that the Schwab Brin discussion at WEF was back in 2017.

And it's Chancey not Chaucey.