Kyle Rittenhouse...

[CivilDiscourse]

Licensed paramedic? Did he present evidence of that, or he just claimed it?

TBH, I'm not even sure why it's relevant.

[Mountain Man]

Licensed paramedic? Did he present evidence of that, or he just claimed it?

Does it matter? Whether he was or not has nothing at all to do with the fact that he threatened Rittenhouse with a deadly weapon which fully justifies Rittenhouse firing in self defense.

[Ronson]

TBH, I'm not even sure why it's relevant.

It's relevant because he's lying if he's not. And I seem to recall last year, hearing he got himself a "paramedic" hat and that was his sole qualification.

[rogue06]

These lying reports are just going to cause more violent protests when Rittenhouse get exonerated.

Almost like that is the intent as they see the case against him collapsing.

[Ronson]

posting error

[Sparko]

Licensed paramedic? Did he present evidence of that, or he just claimed it?

his linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gaige-gr...utz-7779a5105/

[Mountain Man]

It's relevant because he's lying if he's not. And I seem to recall last year, hearing he got himself a "paramedic" hat and that was his sole qualification.

Certainly he should be charged with perjury (he lied to police when they asked if he had a gun in his hand when he confronted Rittenhouse, but he claimed he was confused because of the medication he had received in the hospital) and possibly attempted assault with a deadly weapon, but likely he will face no consequences other than the wound he suffered during the incident.

[Gondwanaland]

Certainly he should be charged with perjury (he lied to police when they asked if he had a gun in his hand when he confronted Rittenhouse, but he claimed he was confused because of the medication he had received in the hospital)

Unless he lied in court as well, I'm unsure how he could be charged with perjury on that particular point. You can lie to the police, that's not perjury, if you later tell the truth in court.

[Mountain Man]

Unless he lied in court as well, I'm unsure how he could be charged with perjury on that particular point. You can lie to the police, that's not perjury, if you later tell the truth in court.

You're right, if he wasn't under oath at the time then it wouldn't be perjury.

[Gondwanaland]

You're right, if he wasn't under oath at the time then it wouldn't be perjury.

Now if he signed a statement under oath to the police, that would be a different story, but my understanding is it was just basic police questioning.

[NorrinRadd]

I wonder what kind of crap-show there would be if the jury, out of fear, returned a guilty verdict, and the judge overturned the verdict.

[seer]

Going after the Jury now?

Rittenhouse judge says person caught filming jurors, orders deletion along with 'new procedures'

The Wisconsin judge overseeing the murder trial of Kyle Rittenhouse announced Tuesday that deputies had caught someone recording video of the jurors earlier in the day and would be taking new steps to ensure the incident did not happen again, in addition to ordering the person to delete the images.

The jury entered the Kenosha County courtroom on Tuesday morning and was greeted by Judge Bruce Schroeder, who referenced "the incident at the bus pick-up this morning." Before the panel of jurors arrived, Schroeder had revealed that someone was spotted filming the group.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/kyle-ritt...y-video-delete

[seanD]

Almost like that is the intent as they see the case against him collapsing.

It's amazing how the conservatives had it correct from the start, and how the political left had it so incorrect and still have it wrong because of the type of media they both subscribe to. In fact, I found out more details about the event thanks to the trial that just underscores how correct the political right had it from the start.

[seer]

It's amazing how the conservatives had it correct from the start, and how the political left had it so incorrect and still have it wrong because of the type of media they both subscribe to. In fact, I found out more details about the event thanks to the trial that just underscores how correct the political right had it from the start.

That is why we are called the right...

[Ronson]

It's amazing how the conservatives had it correct from the start, and how the political left had it so incorrect and still have it wrong because of the type of media they both subscribe to. In fact, I found out more details about the event thanks to the trial that just underscores how correct the political right had it from the start.

Anyone who watched the videos from that night should have it right. It is plain as day. Anyone who watched the videos and got it wrong is taking the narrative from the MSM.