Originally posted by Ronson
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
What Would a Civil War Look Like Today?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Ronson View Post
There's a huge problem with the military getting involved. Street fighting (assuming that would happen) would create lots of civilian casualties. And people in the US have family all over the place, and friends of family. In the Civil War you had Sherman routing and burning Atlanta, which was only possible because he and all of his men were from the North. We have a fully integrated military now. And would the military want to create much damage to buildings and infrastructure since this is their country and their infrastructure? I can't envision very deep military involvement.
I would also argue cultural and ideological divisions within USA are secondary to contributing the breakup of the USA. The United States Armed Forces are what ultimately keep the USA glued together, and no amount of civilian division or uprising will split the nation as long as the U.S. Armed Forces are institutionally intact (It is a monstrous juggernaut of an institution, virtually impervious as it is). Any "envisioning" of a civil war has to take into account the hypothetical conception of the loyalties amongst the armed forces within for any kind of bonafide civil war to even break out in the first place, do you have any concrete evidence or knowledge of any present officers or elements of the armed forces that compromise (even hypothetically) the integrity of the institution? That would give a greater plausibility when imagining what a contemporary U.S. civil war would look like.Last edited by Andius; 11-22-2020, 01:43 PM.Ladino, Guatemalan, Hispanic, and Latin, but foremostly, Christian.
As of the 1st of December, 2020, officially anointed as this:
"Seinfeld had its Soup Nazi. Tweb has its Taco Nazi." - Rogue06 , https://theologyweb.com/campus/forum...e3#post1210559
Comment
-
Originally posted by Andius View Post
And to be quite frank, the US armed forces show no signs (that I am aware of) of any kind of division or sedition like the kind that kickstarted the U.S. civil war. Any infighting amongst civilians would likely be quickly put down, the National Guard is that efficient. Wether the soldier will be loyal to Washington D.C. or personal family, who knows, but you can be sure civilian death or not, Washington D.C. will not tolerate any kind of uprising, and will hurt and kill anyone to drive the message home to not challenge it.
I would also argue cultural and ideological divisions within USA are secondary to contributing the breakup of the USA. The United States Armed Forces are what ultimately keep the USA glued together, and no amount of civilian division or uprising will split the nation as long as the U.S. Armed Forces are institutionally intact (It is a monstrous juggernaut of an institution, virtually impervious as it is). Any "envisioning" of a civil war has to take into account the hypothetical conception of the loyalties amongst the armed forces within for any kind of bonafide civil war to even break out in the first place, do you have any concrete evidence or knowledge of any present officers or elements of the armed forces that compromise (even hypothetically) the integrity of the institution? That would give a greater plausibility when imagining what a contemporary U.S. civil war would look like.
One thing the military might do is to bring in microwave or sound devices to create pain in crowds. But with the military, you also would have likely use of firearms in many situations.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Andius View Post
And to be quite frank, the US armed forces show no signs (that I am aware of) of any kind of division or sedition like the kind that kickstarted the U.S. civil war. Any infighting amongst civilians would likely be quickly put down, the National Guard is that efficient. Wether the soldier will be loyal to Washington D.C. or personal family, who knows, but you can be sure civilian death or not, Washington D.C. will not tolerate any kind of uprising, and will hurt and kill anyone to drive the message home to not challenge it.
I would also argue cultural and ideological divisions within USA are secondary to contributing the breakup of the USA. The United States Armed Forces are what ultimately keep the USA glued together, and no amount of civilian division or uprising will split the nation as long as the U.S. Armed Forces are institutionally intact (It is a monstrous juggernaut of an institution, virtually impervious as it is). Any "envisioning" of a civil war has to take into account the hypothetical conception of the loyalties amongst the armed forces within for any kind of bonafide civil war to even break out in the first place, do you have any concrete evidence or knowledge of any present officers or elements of the armed forces that compromise (even hypothetically) the integrity of the institution? That would give a greater plausibility when imagining what a contemporary U.S. civil war would look like.
"For I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and acknowledgment of God rather than burnt offerings." Hosea 6:6
"Theology can be an intellectual entertainment." Metropolitan Anthony Bloom
Comment
-
Originally posted by mikewhitney View Post
There have been news stories about the military brass not being aligned with Trump. So if Trump stays President for the next four years, we might have a military leadership on the "other" side.
One thing the military might do is to bring in microwave or sound devices to create pain in crowds. But with the military, you also would have likely use of firearms in many situations.
Biden won, so there would only be extreme right, and racist groups in rebellion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Andius View Post
And to be quite frank, the US armed forces show no signs (that I am aware of) of any kind of division or sedition like the kind that kickstarted the U.S. civil war. Any infighting amongst civilians would likely be quickly put down, the National Guard is that efficient. Wether the soldier will be loyal to Washington D.C. or personal family, who knows, but you can be sure civilian death or not, Washington D.C. will not tolerate any kind of uprising, and will hurt and kill anyone to drive the message home to not challenge it.
I would also argue cultural and ideological divisions within USA are secondary to contributing the breakup of the USA. The United States Armed Forces are what ultimately keep the USA glued together, and no amount of civilian division or uprising will split the nation as long as the U.S. Armed Forces are institutionally intact (It is a monstrous juggernaut of an institution, virtually impervious as it is). Any "envisioning" of a civil war has to take into account the hypothetical conception of the loyalties amongst the armed forces within for any kind of bonafide civil war to even break out in the first place, do you have any concrete evidence or knowledge of any present officers or elements of the armed forces that compromise (even hypothetically) the integrity of the institution? That would give a greater plausibility when imagining what a contemporary U.S. civil war would look like.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mikewhitney View Post
There have been news stories about the military brass not being aligned with Trump. So if Trump stays President for the next four years, we might have a military leadership on the "other" side.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
As individuals there has always been officers on different sides, but in recent history the military remains unite behind the nation. Of course, the Civil War divided the USA along stark North South lines which had been their from many years there is no such state, regional or political division in the military ranks of the officers today.
Biden won, so there would only be extreme right, and racist groups in rebellion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ronson View Post
You mean like when they ignored the troop drawdown in the ME that he ordered? I haven't heard if that story was confirmed or not.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mikewhitney View Post
I know. It is hard to know what the realities are. We really have to find sources that can prove ideas sufficiently. Too much reliance on anonymous sources is a similar reason for concern.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mikewhitney View Post
Right. There are the racist Antifa and BLM who would be against the extreme freedom lovers. I suspect this division has been orchestrated. Most Democrats are not as extreme leftists nor are most Republicans extreme promoters of freedom.
.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
There are numerous extreme right and racist organization members in the ranks
.
Either the military is training people wrong or the people are trained with patriotism which promotes protection of the nation with acts separate from the military roles. It would be odd and horrible if veterans, who have fought for this country, were not continuing to be interested in the subsequent state of the nation and its protection.
I don't want some white-supremacists to take over the nation just like I don't want radical Antifa and BLM to be out burning cities. We need sound government and peaceful streets. But there is no likely solution in sight for either of these.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by mikewhitney View Post
This is too vague about the beliefs to determine the perspective of these groups. Plus, any reference to the SPLC is nonsense. It is the racist Antifa and BLM (plus many democrats who call the masses deplorables) makes a general concern that promotes such reactive groups.
Either the military is training people wrong or the people are trained with patriotism which promotes protection of the nation with acts separate from the military roles. It would be odd and horrible if veterans, who have fought for this country, were not continuing to be interested in the subsequent state of the nation and its protection.
I don't want some white-supremacists to take over the nation just like I don't want radical Antifa and BLM to be out burning cities. We need sound government and peaceful streets. But there is no likely solution in sight for either of these.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Ronson, Today, 08:45 AM
|
5 responses
46 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Ronson
Today, 03:01 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, 05-03-2024, 01:19 PM
|
26 responses
203 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
Today, 03:06 PM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 05-03-2024, 12:23 PM
|
99 responses
417 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by alaskazimm
Today, 04:54 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, 05-03-2024, 11:46 AM
|
21 responses
138 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Yesterday, 06:52 AM
|
||
Started by seer, 05-03-2024, 04:37 AM
|
23 responses
115 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
05-03-2024, 02:49 PM
|
Comment