White supremacists involved in the violence of BLM demonstrations

[CivilDiscourse]

Vindictive sarcasm noted, and I have already responded.

Nope. When asked why you believed that statement, all you said was that "the determination was made by law enforcement."

When asked about other "determinations by law enforcement" you said "Only in the statements made in the post that opened this thread."



What you haven't answered is what makes the one statement believable and the others not? Why do you believe the OP statement?

[shunyadragon]

Nope. When asked why you believed that statement, all you said was that "the determination was made by law enforcement."

When asked about other "determinations by law enforcement" you said "Only in the statements made in the post that opened this thread."



What you haven't answered is what makes the one statement believable and the others not? Why do you believe the OP statement?

Vindictive sarcasm noted, and I have already responded.

[CivilDiscourse]

Vindictive sarcasm noted, and I have already responded.

You do like to dodge. And there was no vindictive sarcasm, that was just not a true statement on your part, no matter how many times you repeat it.

[shunyadragon]

You do like to dodge. And there was no vindictive sarcasm, that was just not a true statement on your part, no matter how many times you repeat it.

Vindictive sarcasm noted, and I have already responded.

[CivilDiscourse]

Vindictive sarcasm noted, and I have already responded.

You keep avoiding the question. Is there a reason why?

[shunyadragon]

You keep avoiding the question. Is there a reason why?

Vindictive sarcasm noted, and I have already responded.

[CivilDiscourse]

Vindictive sarcasm noted, and I have already responded.

Since you are giving me the last real word here (given your copy/paste responses) I will state that you refuse to state why you actually believe this report. The only reason really able to be decerned is you believe it because you want to believe it to be true so that you can use it to excuse violence from BLM.

Have a good day.

[shunyadragon]

Since you are giving me the last real word here (given your copy/paste responses) I will state that you refuse to state why you actually believe this report. The only reason really able to be decerned is you believe it because you want to believe it to be true so that you can use it to excuse violence from BLM.

Have a good day.

indictive sarcasm noted, and I have already responded.

[Sparko]

indictive sarcasm noted, and I have already responded.

I know you are but what am I?

[CivilDiscourse]

I know you are but what am I?

He never really did respond though. That was just his way of running away without actually answering WHY this group was believeable except for a "Law enforcement determination" that he ONLY believes in this case, and no other ones. Selective Appeal to Authority.

[Sparko]

He never really did respond though. That was just his way of running away without actually answering WHY this group was believeable except for a "Law enforcement determination" that he ONLY believes in this case, and no other ones. Selective Appeal to Authority.

Yeah, basically he is doing this:

nan-nuh-nan-nuh-na-na-cant-hear-you-23925378.png

[CivilDiscourse]

Yeah, basically he is doing this:

nan-nuh-nan-nuh-na-na-cant-hear-you-23925378.png

kept calling it "vindictive sarcasm". Which wasn't ever there.

[shunyadragon]

He never really did respond though. That was just his way of running away without actually answering WHY this group was believeable except for a "Law enforcement determination" that he ONLY believes in this case, and no other ones. Selective Appeal to Authority.

This thread dealt with this case, and not a shotgun approach to everything.

[CivilDiscourse]

This thread dealt with this case, and not a shotgun approach to everything.

Vindictive sarcasm noted, and I have already responded.

[shunyadragon]

Vindictive sarcasm noted, and I have already responded.

Vindictive sarcasm noted, and I have already responded.