It's like watching a meltdown take place.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comment Thread for The Resurrection of Jesus - Apologiaphoenix vs Gary
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Originally posted by psstein View PostI've been away for all of 36 hours, and there's a whole new mess.
Using a site called "Biblical Nonsense" is so balanced and fair, right? Or you could consult scholars and commentaries (e.g. the Anchor Bible Commentary on Genesis, the Jewish Publication Society commentary, etc.). But those would require some sort of actual inquiry.
Also, the "atheists/agnostics aren't philosophical naturalists" has to be a joke. You cannot claim atheism based on methodological naturalism.
Comment
-
Originally posted by psstein View PostI feel like every post gets stupider.
Here's some bold letters: IF YOU CANNOT READ THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGES, YOU ARE READING AN INTERPRETATION. You cannot conduct competent exegesis unless you know the original languages. I do not exegete the NT because I haven't yet learned (enough) Greek. The same is true with the OT. My Hebrew is better than most, but far more competent exegetes should commentate on the text.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Gary View PostI have previously stated that there are three ways to be rid of me from this site:
1. The moderators can ban me.
2. The moderators can close this thread.
3. YOU, Nick, can request that I leave.
Whatever you do please don't do number 2. Thats what he wants. Put up a bunch of nonsense that no one has had the time to respond to and then you lock it like you had no answerLast edited by Mikeenders; 09-23-2015, 11:19 PM.
Comment
-
Hey gary...lol....want a taste?
Notice how many legs this grasshopper is actually using to crawl? Locust are the same. they use FOUR legs to do most of their crawling. they do most of the time move but mostly just stabilizing and much more prominent for jumping not crawling
Care to go back and read the verse??
http://www.tektonics.org/af/buglegs.phpLast edited by Mikeenders; 09-23-2015, 11:29 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by psstein View PostI feel like every post gets stupider.
Here's some bold letters: IF YOU CANNOT READ THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGES, YOU ARE READING AN INTERPRETATION. You cannot conduct competent exegesis unless you know the original languages. I do not exegete the NT because I haven't yet learned (enough) Greek. The same is true with the OT. My Hebrew is better than most, but far more competent exegetes should commentate on the text.
Quite a bit of his other points are based on the same ignorance. If a phrase is used in a way that does not match our usage several thousand years later then its proof the text is wrong. Its really quite silly.
Comment
-
ROFL.....Its gets even better now his Youtube sources are
SOAP OPERA ACTORS.......LOL
http://www.cbs.com/shows/the_bold_an...st/61863/?pg=1
Unfortunately (for Gary) poor Scott the actors is known to use quite a bit of strawmenLast edited by Mikeenders; 09-23-2015, 11:45 PM.
Comment
widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
Comment