Nero Became Demon Possessed After Paul's Testimony?

[Tassman]

From our perspective, it's the militant atheist who's dealing in escapist nonsense.

You appear to be suffering from the delusion that this is a win for Dr. Ehrman. He should stick to fields in which he's actually qualified.

You wouldn't have to be if you knew Jesus.

You mean like Haley Joel Osment in The Sixth Sense? He knew dead people too.

[One Bad Pig]

Seeking what, exactly, the escapist nonsense you like to consider to be true?

CEPG0BtWoAAlovd.jpg
From our perspective, it's the militant atheist who's dealing in escapist nonsense.

Ah, apologists Gary Habermas and Michael Licona strike again with their of the resurrection.

See Prof. Bart Ehrman: 2009 Debate With Mike Licona: Can Historians Prove the Resurrection of Jesus?

https://ehrmanblog.org/video-ehrman-...a-2009-debate/

You appear to be suffering from the delusion that this is a win for Dr. Ehrman. He should stick to fields in which he's actually qualified.

https://michaelshermer.com/2017/04/h...-resurrection/

Lemme know what it is you think this proves, k?

The standard CP argument, it seems, when incapable of addressing the topic under discussion. Sad.

You appear to be confusing "not willing to refute the same tired argument for the 1,000 time" with "incapable". Sad!

You're much better at rational conversation when you don't have skin in the game. When your conclusions are assumed as fact and set in adamantine, like they are here, interacting with you gets tiresome fast.

[One Bad Pig]

If I were dealing with an honest seeker, I would refer to the impossible faith thesis and the five basic facts concerning the Resurrection, but in this case, that would be like giving pearls to pigs. The little piggy just can't comprehend the value and is upset it is not edible.

[Christianbookworm]

You mean J.P. Holding's book/web article?

In a way, the impossible faith thesis has been around since the book of Acts.

[Cow Poke]

Sad.

You wouldn't have to be if you knew Jesus.

[Seeker]

If I were dealing with an honest seeker, I would refer to the impossible faith thesis

You mean J.P. Holding's book/web article?

[Tassman]

If I were dealing with an honest seeker,

Seeking what, exactly, the escapist nonsense you like to consider to be true?

I would refer to the impossible faith thesis and the five basic facts concerning the Resurrection,

Ah, apologists Gary Habermas and Michael Licona strike again with their of the resurrection.

See Prof. Bart Ehrman: 2009 Debate With Mike Licona: Can Historians Prove the Resurrection of Jesus?

https://ehrmanblog.org/video-ehrman-...a-2009-debate/

https://michaelshermer.com/2017/04/h...-resurrection/

WAAAAAaaaaannnnnhhhhhhh

The standard CP argument, it seems, when incapable of addressing the topic under discussion. Sad.

[Christianbookworm]

If I were dealing with an honest seeker, I would refer to the impossible faith thesis and the five basic facts concerning the Resurrection, but in this case, that would be like giving pearls to pigs. The little piggy just can't comprehend the value and is upset it is not edible.

[Cow Poke]

WAAAAAaaaaannnnnhhhhhhh

[Tassman]

You're working overtime at trying to sound like an idiot when you really don't have to.

"Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ".

And the disenfranchisement of women was justified by the likes of texts such as: 1 Timothy 2:12 "I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet".

[Cow Poke]

Is firstfloor being excluded on the account of having already won a lifetime award?

I think firstfloor is just purposely flaky -not dumb.

[KingsGambit]

I think you must be contending for the "dumbest poster" award, Tassy. You got my vote.

Is firstfloor being excluded on the account of having already won a lifetime award?

[Cow Poke]

So, there have been no eternal moral truths exhibited by Christianity down through the ages, just individual actions perpetrated by the likes of CP.

I think you must be contending for the "dumbest poster" award, Tassy. You got my vote.

[rogue06]

But not to those who, with scriptural justification in the name of their deity, disenfranchised women, owned slaves and etc. etc. etc.

You're working overtime at trying to sound like an idiot when you really don't have to.

[Tassman]

The cloven hooves belong to those who revel in their sin.

But not to those who, with scriptural justification in the name of their deity, disenfranchised women, owned slaves and etc. etc. etc.