St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle. Be our defense against the wickedness and snares of the devil. May God rebuke him, we humbly pray, and do thou, O Prince of heavenly hosts, by the power of God, thrust into hell Satan, and all evil spirits, who prowl about the world seeking the ruin of souls.
Announcement
Collapse
Apologetics 301 Guidelines
If you think this is the area where you tell everyone you are sorry for eating their lunch out of the fridge, it probably isn't the place for you
This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.
Forum Rules: Here
This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
The Roman Church response to the atrocious scandals; "The Devil made me do it!"
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Leonhard View PostThis is recited daily by many Catholics in my parish at the end of their daily rosary prayer.
"Fire is catching. If we burn, you burn with us!"
"I'm not going anywhere. I'm going to stay here and cause all kinds of trouble."
Katniss Everdeen
Christ our Passover has been sacrificed for us. Therefore let us keep the feast.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostI wonder if they'd be having these problems if they had employed "the Billy Graham rule" that liberals love to mock.
Maybe more relevant is what the Boy Scouts do. They have a rule where no boy can be alone with any adult leader (unless it's his father). I don't know how that would work within the context of private confession, though."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
Comment
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostI don't see how the Billy Graham rule would have stopped priests from raping boys.
Maybe more relevant is what the Boy Scouts do. They have a rule where no boy can be alone with any adult leader (unless it's his father). I don't know how that would work within the context of private confession, though.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostIn this case, the logical extension of the Billy Graham rule would have included underaged boys."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
Comment
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostThen it wouldn't be the Billy Graham rule (since that's specifically about women you're not married to) but a blanket prohibition on being alone with anybody, which we know Graham didn't rule out, with famous accounts of him personally counseling various famous people.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostI don't see how the Billy Graham rule would have stopped priests from raping boys.
Maybe more relevant is what the Boy Scouts do. They have a rule where no boy can be alone with any adult leader (unless it's his father). I don't know how that would work within the context of private confession, though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostI wonder if they'd be having these problems if they had employed "the Billy Graham rule" that liberals love to mock.
The Billy Graham rule is nice, but I do not consider sufficient to apply to this problem. I do not believe the evangelical ministry claimed the 'divine authority' as in the hierarchy of the Roman Church Priesthood.
Also by the evidence I believe it was an 'honor system' the always did not work among evangelical preachers.Last edited by shunyadragon; 10-08-2018, 08:16 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mossrose View PostI probably should have clarified that allowing the clergy to marry might have prevented a lot of these assaults. Perhaps the propensity to assault boys might not have been so prevalent in married clergy.
https://cruxnow.com/church-in-the-us...-in-metoo-era/
Of course, in a works-based system that says that all you need to do is confess your sin to another priest and do so much penance lets any sort of sinful behaviour run rampant,
Comment
-
Originally posted by mossrose View PostAll they really needed to do was to not insist on "celibacy" for their clergy. Not that it would have prevented all issues, but maybe would have prevented a great deal of them.
The problem is not celibacy, but lack of the virtues of continence & chastity.
Celibacy is the state of having never had a wife, and is entirely compatible with fornication, adultery, sexual experimentation, & so on.
What is insisted on in the Roman Rite is not celibacy, or even virginity - widowers, who have by definition ceased to be celibates, can be ordained to the priesthood - but a practice of the virtue of chastity in the form of a continence that forgoes sexual activity for the sake of the Kingdom of God. It is the sacrifice of the exercise of a natural appetite, and is therefore a recognition that what is sacrificed is a good; to sacrifice something bad would be no sacrifice at all.
Continence, it should be emphasised, is practiced by spouses as truly as by those who are chaste but not married.Last edited by Rushing Jaws; 10-09-2018, 01:47 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostI don't see how the Billy Graham rule would have stopped priests from raping boys.
Maybe more relevant is what the Boy Scouts do. They have a rule where no boy can be alone with any adult leader (unless it's his father). I don't know how that would work within the context of private confession, though.Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rushing Jaws View PostCelibacy is not, and never has been, the issue. To say it is impossible or unnatural, is insulting to those who are celibate, and are not debauchees. Was Christ a debauchee ? For He had no wife. To treat marriage as though it were absolutely necessary, is to ignore the witness of the NT in particular, & to fall for the myth that one cannot survive without engaging in carnal relations.
The problem is not celibacy, but lack of the virtues of continence & chastity.
Celibacy is the state of having never had a wife, and is entirely compatible with fornication, adultery, sexual experimentation, & so on.
What is insisted on in the Roman Rite is not celibacy, or even virginity - widowers, who have by definition ceased to be celibates, can be ordained to the priesthood - but a practice of the virtue of chastity in the form of a continence that forgoes sexual activity for the sake of the Kingdom of God. It is the sacrifice of the exercise of a natural appetite, and is therefore a recognition that what is sacrificed is a good; to sacrifice something bad would be no sacrifice at all.
Continence, it should be emphasised, is practiced by spouses as truly as by those who are chaste but not married.
So, then, what is the cause of so much homosexual behaviour among the clergy of the RC?
Securely anchored to the Rock amid every storm of trial, testing or tribulation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostI agree to the extent that having a celibate clergy reduces the possibility of acceptable sexual outlets, which then find satisfaction in utterly unacceptable ways such as with children. But the Protestant congregations have also had their sexual problems with the likes of Jimmy Swaggart and Ted Haggard. "several prominent evangelical institutions have been rocked in recent weeks by their own sexual misconduct allegations against pastors and church leaders who exploited the trust they had gained from faithful churchgoers."
https://cruxnow.com/church-in-the-us...-in-metoo-era/
Securely anchored to the Rock amid every storm of trial, testing or tribulation.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by whag, 04-09-2024, 01:04 PM
|
461 responses
2,057 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Diogenes
Yesterday, 04:17 PM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 02-04-2024, 05:06 AM
|
254 responses
1,230 views
0 likes
|
Last Post 05-22-2024, 12:21 PM | ||
Started by whag, 01-18-2024, 01:35 PM
|
49 responses
374 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by tabibito
05-15-2024, 02:53 PM
|
Comment