Originally posted by 37818
View Post
Originally posted by 37818
View Post
Originally posted by 37818
View Post
My point, 37, is that the presence of historically accurate elements in a narrative does not necessarily mean the entire narrative is historically accurate. Authors weave such details into a narrative for any number of reasons. It may be simply to tell a compelling story. It may also be to convey the message, "this is important - pay attention!" It does not mean the other elements must be necessarily accepted as historically accurate.
Comment