Originally posted by Mountain Man
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Apologetics 301 Guidelines
If you think this is the area where you tell everyone you are sorry for eating their lunch out of the fridge, it probably isn't the place for you
This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.
Forum Rules: Here
This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
The flaws of NT-based morality
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Kbertsche View PostFirst, don't try to move your goal posts by introducing other religions! Your conversation was specific to CHRISTIANS; you claimed that CHRISTIAN groups have changed their view of slavery, and your previous comment in this immediate subthread was in response to MountainMan's claim that CHRISTIANS reject "selective interpretation" of the Bible.
Second, do you realize that Christianity also has experts in relevant fields (biblical languages, biblical history, theology) who dedicate their lives and careers to the correct interpretation of the biblical text?
Third, I agree with you that different denominations within Christianity hold mutually exclusive beliefs. But is this substantially different than the situation in science, history, literature, or any other field of study? Have you ever heard of controversies within science, with different factions holding mutually exclusive views? This is the case with EVERY new theory or idea! Usually these controversies are resolved over time, but it can take many decades, and there can still be hold-outs. Alvarez' dinosaur-meteor theory took a full decade to become generally accepted, and there are still some holdouts today who do not accept a causal connection.Last edited by Tassman; 08-11-2017, 12:28 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostThe point being made is that belief systems based upon revelation, whether CHRISTIAN or any other religion...or New Age woo...are not able to be empirically verified.
"Empirical verification" is a red herring in this context. We are simply discussing how to correctly interpret a text. We are not discussing how the text came to be, whether or not it is believed, or whether or not it is true.
Originally posted by Tassman View PostTrue! But, unlike theological/biblical beliefs, in science the competing hypotheses can be ultimately resolved as established science...to the extent we can confidently put a man on the moon. We can never have this degree of certainly re religious texts regardless of the religion or the quality of scholarship.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View PostThe evidence indicates there were may across the globe that justified slavery with Biblical references, and pragmatic economic and colonial benefit.Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kbertsche View PostYour comments were in regards to Christian biblical interpretation. My responses here are restricted to Christian biblical interpretation.
"Empirical verification" is a red herring in this context. We are simply discussing how to correctly interpret a text. We are not discussing how the text came to be, whether or not it is believed, or whether or not it is true.I predict that we will each have complete certainty re religious texts at the instant that we die.
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostYou assume that the majority of Christians back then were OK with slavery.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostThis is you shifting the goalposts. We are not just you were responding to my question:
You have agreed that science often has conflicting interpretations of data, with ongoing disagreement on which interpretation is correct. Are you now changing your mind about this?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kbertsche View PostThe question of "how to correctly interpret a text" assumes that there is a correct (i.e. "true") interpretation. We are talking about the same thing; I have not shifted your goalposts.
You have agreed that science often has conflicting interpretations of data, with ongoing disagreement on which interpretation is correct. Are you now changing your mind about this?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostPlenty of Christians back then were OK with slavery. There is considerable evidence that slavery has been justified throughout history with biblical references. The Southern Baptist Convention alone was founded primarily to retain slavery and this is the largest Protestant body in the United States.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostThe question was who decides which is the correct interpretation?
Then you completely missed my point, which was that science often has long periods of "unsettled science", with different groups holding to differing, mutually exclusive interpretations.
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostTass, the Southern Baptists were not the majority of Christians back in the day. And this does not change the fact that it was largely Christians who populated the Abolition movement - who actually brought slavery down, unlike your enlightenment friends who did squat. And slavery was pretty much universal back then, just about every culture practiced it in one form or another. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_slavery
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kbertsche View Post
Then you completely missed my point, which was that science often has long periods of "unsettled science", with different groups holding to differing, mutually exclusive interpretations.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kbertsche View PostThen you completely missed my point, which was that science often has long periods of "unsettled science", with different groups holding to differing, mutually exclusive interpretations.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by whag, 04-22-2024, 06:28 PM
|
17 responses
104 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
04-23-2024, 01:46 PM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 04-17-2024, 08:31 AM
|
70 responses
398 views
0 likes
|
Last Post 04-26-2024, 05:47 AM | ||
Started by Neptune7, 04-15-2024, 06:54 AM
|
25 responses
168 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cerebrum123
04-17-2024, 08:31 AM
|
||
Started by whag, 04-09-2024, 01:04 PM
|
271 responses
1,229 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Today, 01:01 PM | ||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 02-04-2024, 05:06 AM
|
208 responses
1,000 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
Today, 02:18 PM
|
Comment