Or actually, convince me that I should take anything other than the two-source hypothesis
Announcement
Collapse
Apologetics 301 Guidelines
If you think this is the area where you tell everyone you are sorry for eating their lunch out of the fridge, it probably isn't the place for you
This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.
Forum Rules: Here
This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Solve the Synoptic Problem
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Aractus View PostOr actually, convince me that I should take anything other than the two-source hypothesis or a variation on it seriously.
At the end of the day is there any demonstrable difference in predictions made between a multi-source hypothesis and a two-source hypothesis?
The other working hypothesis I can accept as reasonable (in fact I came up with it, although I'm sure someone else has already thought of this idea) is that Matt/Lk used a further redacted version of Mark that I will call "post-Mark", but that post-Mark did not survive.Last edited by Starlight; 06-04-2017, 01:43 AM."I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
"[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein
-
Originally posted by Starlight View PostWhat about a multi-source hypothesis: That numerous short written fragments were in general circulation among Jesus' followers each half a page to a page in length and giving an account of a single event/teaching? And then each gospel writer either included all the fragments their community had into a single narrative, or selectively choose from among the fragments available to them, and added a bit from oral teachings they'd heard?
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by whag, 04-22-2024, 06:28 PM
|
17 responses
104 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
04-23-2024, 01:46 PM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 04-17-2024, 08:31 AM
|
70 responses
407 views
0 likes
|
Last Post 04-26-2024, 05:47 AM | ||
Started by whag, 04-09-2024, 01:04 PM
|
330 responses
1,465 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by tabibito
Today, 08:01 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 02-04-2024, 05:06 AM
|
254 responses
1,212 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Yesterday, 12:21 PM | ||
Started by whag, 01-18-2024, 01:35 PM
|
49 responses
370 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by tabibito
05-15-2024, 02:53 PM
|
Comment