Announcement

Collapse

Apologetics 301 Guidelines

If you think this is the area where you tell everyone you are sorry for eating their lunch out of the fridge, it probably isn't the place for you


This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.


Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

The Argument From Reason...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tassman
    replied
    Originally posted by seer View Post

    That again is nonsense. The act happened, in real time, whether I could prove it to anyone else. If three other people witnessed it their view is still subjective to them. Whether just me, or others, witnessed the act make no difference concerning whether the act happened or not. The act itself is independent of verification, or lack thereof.
    Indeed. It is historically verifiable. But your argument goes further. You claim that a purely subjective experience is “as true as any verifiable" scientific discovery”. It is NOT.

    By personal experience, just as you do.
    But without verification there is no means of determining the “truth” of your personal subjective experience compared to that of another’s, whose subjective experience conflicts with yours.


    Leave a comment:


  • seer
    replied
    Originally posted by Tassman View Post

    If your morning tea is verified by others then it is an objective historical fact not an independent “subjective truth”, separate from the physical, material brain.
    That again is nonsense. The act happened, in real time, whether I could prove it to anyone else. If three other people witnessed it their view is still subjective to them. Whether just me, or others, witnessed the act make no difference concerning whether the act happened or not. The act itself is independent of verification, or lack thereof.



    So, how do you determine the “truth” – by ‘feelings’ alone?
    By personal experience, just as you do.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tassman
    replied
    Originally posted by seer View Post

    That is just stupid Tass, it is not only true for me it is a fact, a historical fact if you will.
    If your morning tea is verified by others then it is an objective historical fact not an independent “subjective truth”, separate from the physical, material brain.

    And having the ability to prove it to anyone else is immaterial to the truth of the matter. Many of our encounters in life can not be 'substantiated by evidence' but that does not make then less real or true.
    So, how do you determine the “truth” – by ‘feelings’ alone?






    Leave a comment:


  • seer
    replied
    Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post

    You appear to have confirmed my underlying suspicion.
    Is your subconscious deluding you again?

    Leave a comment:


  • Hypatia_Alexandria
    replied
    Originally posted by seer View Post

    And? I'm a Christian for goodness sake and that is an Apologetic board...
    You appear to have confirmed my underlying suspicion.

    Leave a comment:


  • seer
    replied
    Originally posted by tabibito View Post

    You should know by now that the only person entitled to have preconceived religious beliefs is H_A.
    I forgot - mea culpa, mea culpa, mea culpa....

    Leave a comment:


  • tabibito
    replied
    Originally posted by seer View Post

    And? I'm a Christian for goodness sake and that is an Apologetic board...
    You should know by now that the only person entitled to have preconceived religious beliefs is H_A.

    Leave a comment:


  • seer
    replied
    Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post

    Your attempts to use philosophy, logic, reason, concepts of reality to support your own preconceived theological beliefs.
    And? I'm a Christian for goodness sake and that is an Apologetic board...

    Leave a comment:


  • Hypatia_Alexandria
    replied
    Originally posted by seer View Post

    Which is?
    Your attempts to use philosophy, logic, reason, concepts of reality to support your own preconceived theological beliefs.

    Leave a comment:


  • seer
    replied
    Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post

    I am commenting on what appears to be an underlying theme of many of your threads.
    Which is?

    Leave a comment:


  • Hypatia_Alexandria
    replied
    Originally posted by seer View Post

    But you bring up things that have nothing to do with what I said. Why do you do that?
    I am commenting on what appears to be an underlying theme of many of your threads.

    Leave a comment:


  • seer
    replied
    Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post

    I made some points that is all. You are not obliged to continue to address them.
    But you bring up things that have nothing to do with what I said. Why do you do that?

    Leave a comment:


  • Hypatia_Alexandria
    replied
    Originally posted by seer View Post

    Good grief! I suspect that in your unconscious mind you are a complete idiot...



    But that has nothing to do with the point I was making!
    I made some points that is all. You are not obliged to continue to address them.

    Leave a comment:


  • seer
    replied
    Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post
    As you cannot access your unconscious you cannot actually know that, can you?
    Good grief! I suspect that in your unconscious mind you are a complete idiot...

    I am simply pointing out that a belief in post-mortem judgements predate Christianity. Hence the fear of death and what happens afterwards are very old considerations in human societies.
    But that has nothing to do with the point I was making!

    Leave a comment:


  • Hypatia_Alexandria
    replied
    Originally posted by seer View Post

    We are all individuals HA, I was converted at 37 years old, 30 years ago - and fear of death played no part in that conversion.
    As you cannot access your unconscious you cannot actually know that, can you?

    Originally posted by seer View Post

    What the heck does that have to do with what I said?
    I am simply pointing out that a belief in post-mortem judgements predate Christianity. Hence the fear of death and what happens afterwards are very old considerations in human societies.

    Leave a comment:

Related Threads

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by whag, 04-22-2024, 06:28 PM
17 responses
104 views
0 likes
Last Post Sparko
by Sparko
 
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 04-17-2024, 08:31 AM
70 responses
402 views
0 likes
Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
Started by whag, 04-09-2024, 01:04 PM
279 responses
1,258 views
0 likes
Last Post tabibito  
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 02-04-2024, 05:06 AM
213 responses
1,046 views
0 likes
Last Post Sparko
by Sparko
 
Started by whag, 01-18-2024, 01:35 PM
49 responses
370 views
0 likes
Last Post tabibito  
Working...
X