Did Jesus have sexual desires?

[Darfius]

Are you saying that you only have platonic relationships and think romantic relationships would be inherently sinful?

No, I am saying that attraction is not inherently sexual.

[Darfius]

friendship. Shared interests. But there is no "attraction" to them as I was using the word. I am speaking of sexual attraction and you know it. There is a desire in you for the opposite sex. You are attracted to women and when you see one that fits your idea of beauty or other criteria, you want to get to know her, to date her, maybe even eventually to marry her if you fall in love. Or you can feel that attraction and decide "no, I am not ready for a relationship, so I will be celibate and not seek out a girlfriend"

And that drive, that attraction is different from what you feel for your male friends. Because it is a SEXUAL drive.

At this point you are evading and dodging pretty consistently, and trying to deflect everything back at me that I bring up to get you to see what I am saying. That pretty much tells me that you know you are wrong but won't admit it. Thanks for playing.

You are merely begging the question. Not everyone only appreciates women for what they can offer sexually. In fact, as C.S. Lewis wrote, most men in love are not thinking of sex at all.

[Sparko]

No, I am saying that attraction is not inherently sexual.

it is when it drives you to seek out the opposite sex for a relationship instead of the same sex. It explains why you like women instead of men. You are attracted to women sexually. It doesn't mean you are some horny goat trying to have sex. It doesn't mean you have lust for every woman you see or even a particular one. It means your mind and body are attracted to the opposite sex in a sexual manner.

[Sparko]

You are merely begging the question. Not everyone only appreciates women for what they can offer sexually. In fact, as C.S. Lewis wrote, most men in love are not thinking of sex at all.

So you only seek out women for platonic relationships? And any man who is attracted to women for a possible romantic relationship is sinning?

You prove with every dodge that you know you are wrong. Just admit it already.

[Darfius]

So you only seek out women for platonic relationships? And any man who is attracted to women for a possible romantic relationship is sinning?

You prove with every dodge that you know you are wrong. Just admit it already.

And you prove with every begged question that your idea of "romance" is doing the horizontal tango. (I know, how crass).

[Sparko]

And you prove with every begged question that your idea of "romance" is doing the horizontal tango. (I know, how crass).

do you even know what a begged question IS?

My job is done here. Your ad homs and deflections show you do not have an answer and yet do not want to admit you are wrong. So you are acting like a child.

If that is what you want then: "neener, neener. you lose, you loser!"

[Christianbookworm]

do you even know what a begged question IS?

My job is done here. Your ad homs and deflections show you do not have an answer and yet do not want to admit you are wrong. So you are acting like a child.

If that is what you want then: "neener, neener. you lose, you loser!"

Darfius is begging the question that sex is evulllll!!!!

[Darfius]

do you even know what a begged question IS?

My job is done here. Your ad homs and deflections show you do not have an answer and yet do not want to admit you are wrong. So you are acting like a child.

If that is what you want then: "neener, neener. you lose, you loser!"

What did I deflect? And for clarity's sake, the question you are begging is that romance can be equated with sex.

[Sparko]

What did I deflect? And for clarity's sake, the question you are begging is that romance can be equated with sex.

OK you seem really "retarded" when it comes to sex or romance. I don't mean "stupid" I mean "held back, naive, uneducated" and I am wasting my time with you. I have explained myself clearly and everyone reading this thread understands what I said, and actually agrees with me. So I am not going to bother with your nonsense any longer if you won't deal with the issue in an adult manner and even attempt to understand what others including me have been saying. Not. Worth. My. Time. buh-bye.

[Darfius]

OK you seem really "retarded" when it comes to sex or romance. I don't mean "stupid" I mean "held back, naive, uneducated" and I am wasting my time with you. I have explained myself clearly and everyone reading this thread understands what I said, and actually agrees with me. So I am not going to bother with your nonsense any longer if you won't deal with the issue in an adult manner and even attempt to understand what others including me have been saying. Not. Worth. My. Time. buh-bye.

"Everyone agrees with me" being your measure of truth validates my claims about the atmosphere here pretty splendidly. Just a reminder, you are supposed to try and become like Jesus, not make Him more like you to feel better about being • Edited by a Moderator • Carry on.

[Cow Poke]

"Everyone agrees with me" being your measure of truth validates my claims about the atmosphere here pretty splendidly. Just a reminder, you are supposed to try and become like Jesus, not make Him more like you to feel better about being • Edited by a Moderator • Carry on.

wow

[Rational Gaze]

I am choosing to be amused.

I'm waiting for more of Darfius' fan fiction. I heard he's making the trilogy into a quadrilogy, by having a stand-alone storyline set in the same universe, but in the future. Apparently, it's going to be a Rom-Com featuring Mel Gibson as the cop from Lethal Weapon, and the T-Rex from Jurassic Park. Danny Glover's character gets killed off halfway through the movie by an evil Chinese warlord played by Jackie Chan who bicycle kicks Danny Glover. However, he kicks him so fast that every time he tries to say his signature 'I'm getting too old for this...' line, he can't finish it, until finally, with the last kick, he completes it and dies. They had some problems getting the movie done, though, since the script has the T-Rex in a lovely polka-dot frock and lipstick, and they're not accustomed to that in the wild, and every time the T-Rex handlers tried putting the lipstick on, the T-Rex would go wild and several arms were eaten. Luckily they signed their waivers beforehand.

[Catholicity]

The only thing that Darfius has proven is that he knows nothing about sex, romance or attraction in humans. And he's definitely single.

[Jedidiah]

The only thing that Darfius has proven is that he knows nothing about sex, romance or attraction in humans. And he's definitely single.

And immature.

[Rational Gaze]

The only thing that Darfius has proven is that he knows nothing about sex, romance or attraction in humans. And he's definitely single.

The more concerning thing, I think, is how he's basically denying the human nature of Christ as, in orthodox theology and belief, Christ had two natures, a divine nature and a human nature. Humans experience desires, even sexual ones. The Bible is quite clear that Jesus experienced temptation. He just didn't give into it.