Hey guys,
I recently read that some scholars believe that Mark 16:9-20 was added at a later date...I have looked around on the web but really don't see any clear answers and I am not one to read pages of debating or literature or whatever. I like to get right to the point and the proof which no one seems to do. It seems everyone likes to go on and on and on so I thought maybe someone here can tell me.
I was looking to see if there is like original jewish manuscripts or catholic manuscripts or something that could give a clear answer.
I saw that other verses in other books support the ending but then some disagree with that as well.
so if it is not the original ending is there any evidence of who may have added this ending?
thanks for any insight :)
I recently read that some scholars believe that Mark 16:9-20 was added at a later date...I have looked around on the web but really don't see any clear answers and I am not one to read pages of debating or literature or whatever. I like to get right to the point and the proof which no one seems to do. It seems everyone likes to go on and on and on so I thought maybe someone here can tell me.
I was looking to see if there is like original jewish manuscripts or catholic manuscripts or something that could give a clear answer.
I saw that other verses in other books support the ending but then some disagree with that as well.
so if it is not the original ending is there any evidence of who may have added this ending?
thanks for any insight :)
Comment