Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Mann vs. Steyn, the Trial of the Century
Collapse
X
-
Mann Misrepresents the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change
From Climate Audit
Excerpt:
Conclusion
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
-
The Original Hide-the-Decline
For years, no one in the consensus-science community challenged Michael Mann's hockey stick representation of modern global warming until after meticulous statistical analyses by a retired Canadian mining engineer, Steve McIntyre, exposed flaws and fraud in Mann's work.
Climate Audit is McIntyre's website, which contains an extensive record of his work analyzing Mann's work here.
I have been posting a series of more recent work by McIntyre specifically related to court filings in the Mann vs. Steyn litigation, the latest of which follows:
From Climate Audit
Excerpt:
I must say that I was a little intrigued to find an example of hide-the-decline a full year before Briffa and Osborn 1999 or Jones et al 1999, previously the earliest hide-the-decline example. In previous analyses of hide-the-decline, I’ve repeatedly emphasized that the technique of deleting data to hide inconvenient results originated with CRU (I’ve previously termed it “Keith’s Science Trick” [Keith = Keith Briffa -JR]). Mann knew of CRU’s deletion of the decline, but, as Lead Author of IPCC AR3, Mann willingly and enthusiastically participated in the hide-the-decline scheme, because he didn’t want to “give fodder to the skeptics” or “dilute the message”. But the technique originated with CRU and the “exoneration” of Jones, Briffa and Osborn on hide-the-decline by Muir Russell and Oxburgh was totally undeserved. (Nor does assignment of blame to CRU excuse Mann’s participation in hide-the-decline as Lead Author of AR3, where Mann and CRU both were culpable.)Last edited by John Reece; 09-09-2014, 05:21 AM.
Comment
-
Another Porky from Mann, Williams and Fontaine
Early on in McIntyre's pioneering statistical analyses exposing the dishonesty in Mann's work re the Hockey Stick graph, he was joined by Ross McKitrick, as is evident here.
With regard to McKitrick, see here, and here; click the Global Warming button on his home page to see links to his varied activities related to that subject.
I have been posting a series of more recent work by McIntyre specifically related to court filings in the Mann vs. Steyn litigation, the latest of which follows:
From Climate Audit
Concluding sentence:
Mann’s claim that the WMO diagram “had absolutely nothing to do with Dr. Mann” stands exposed as yet another porky by Mann and his lawyers.Last edited by John Reece; 09-11-2014, 11:10 AM.
Comment
-
Inventory of Hide-the-Decline
Early on in McIntyre's pioneering statistical analyses exposing the dishonesty in Mann's work re the Hockey Stick graph, he was joined by Ross McKitrick, as is evident here.
With regard to McKitrick, see here, and here; click the Global Warming button on his home page to see links to his varied activities related to that subject.
I have been posting a series of more recent work by McIntyre specifically related to court filings in the Mann vs. Steyn litigation, the latest of which follows:
From Climate Audit
Excerpt:
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seer, Today, 11:43 AM
|
10 responses
25 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seer
Today, 12:28 PM
|
||
Started by seanD, Yesterday, 05:54 PM
|
23 responses
84 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Today, 12:46 PM | ||
Started by rogue06, 05-14-2024, 09:50 PM
|
101 responses
408 views
1 like
|
Last Post
by JimL
Today, 11:15 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 05-14-2024, 04:03 AM
|
25 responses
127 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Yesterday, 11:21 AM | ||
Started by carpedm9587, 05-13-2024, 12:51 PM
|
141 responses
892 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
Today, 10:22 AM
|
Comment