Originally posted by carpedm9587
View Post
Pix, everyone buys things they don't need and many buy things they cannot afford. You're not saying anything here that is germane to the argument I put forward. You seem to have gone off on a tangent of your own making against a position I did not take.
Again, my position (from the outset) has been that statistically some 40% (we can adjust that to 20-40% if you wish) cannot deal with an unexpected expense of $400. That's 65-130 million people. Coupled with the statistics about lack of insurance, it is my opinion that coronavirus testing should be made free for all American citizens - in their interests and the interests of the rest of us.
If you want to argue with that position, you can certainly do so. So far you haven't. You've just started flailing away at some tangent you manufactured. So I'm going to leave the last word to you unless you address the argument I've actually been making.
ETA: Cue the "nail jello to the wall" narrative...
Again, my position (from the outset) has been that statistically some 40% (we can adjust that to 20-40% if you wish) cannot deal with an unexpected expense of $400. That's 65-130 million people. Coupled with the statistics about lack of insurance, it is my opinion that coronavirus testing should be made free for all American citizens - in their interests and the interests of the rest of us.
If you want to argue with that position, you can certainly do so. So far you haven't. You've just started flailing away at some tangent you manufactured. So I'm going to leave the last word to you unless you address the argument I've actually been making.
ETA: Cue the "nail jello to the wall" narrative...
Comment