Originally posted by demi-conservative
View Post
But - at the same time - I know it can't be corrected by the facts, and so I will not try very hard to do so.
To all but those infected with Trumpian denial, a simple observation of the catastrophe unfolding in Italy should suffice. I would love for you to tell me when in the last 50 years something 'less deadly than the flu' has so overwhelmed the hospitals of a modern state that they must now choose who lives and who dies due to equipment shortages? Or that has killed 6% of the people it infects. Or that puts 10% of the people in infect into the hospital needing help breathing?
The current naive mortality stands at 3.7% (total deaths/total cases)
the current worst case mortality stands at 6.7% (total deaths/recoverd+deaths)
S. Korea, where the most extensive testing campaign has been waged is nearing a real mortality of 1% - 10x the flu.
We are regularly pushed to the limit during flu season. This thing is more contagious than the flu and will be 10x that number if not stopped or slowed.
That means 9 out of 10 people needing hospital care will not be able to get it.
In countries with poor medical care, the mortality is much higher. E.g. Iran: naive mortality near 5%.
Mortality for the elderly is more like 10%+
I have posted the numbers. But you'll believe idiots over the facts.
So be it.
Comment