Originally posted by JimL
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Trump bribery policy
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by JimLamebrain View PostI'll tell you what else they did, they made the defense case for them when it comes to allowing witnesses and documentary evidence into the trial. Did you glean that?Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostThis has nothing to do with corruption. Trump's concern is that US businesses will continue to lose opportunities because they're not allowed the same "access" to foreign politicians as their international competitors. Trying to tie this issue into Ukrainian corruption and the impeachment trial is nothing but a red herring, and you've swallowed it hook, line, and sinker.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimLamebrain View PostAh, I see, so in your world, bribery has nothing to do with corruption.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostI assume you mean "they made the prosecution's case for them", and, no, they didn't even though that's the talking point making the rounds. What the defense actually pointed out, correctly, was the weakness of the prosecution's case because they did not present testimony from a single firsthand witness. No, this doesn't magically open the door for a desperate 11th hour mid-trial do-over for the prosecution. What it should lead to is a just acquittal because the prosecution lacked sufficient evidence to prove guilt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostRight, prosecution, thank you for the correction. What they said was that the jury, the Senators, deserve to hear and see all the evidence, not just what the prosecution chooses to show them....
It's like turning in your theme paper to the professor and telling him "I rushed like a mad man to get this finished, then stuck it in my dresser for a month, but never quite got it finished, so.... can YOU please complete it for me before grading it"?The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimLamebrain View PostWhat they said was that the jury, the Senators, deserve to hear and see all the evidence, not just what the prosecution chooses to show them.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Oh, and if the Senate votes to allow new witnesses, Josh Hawley has a resolution ready to go to subpoena Joe, Hunter, Shifty Schiff, Eric Ciaramella, and all communications between Shifty's office and Ciaramella, as well as testimony from Shifty's secret hearings which he suppressed because it exonerated Trump, any communications between House impeachment managers and Democrat presidential candidates, and all documents related to Joe's push to have Shokin fired for investigating Hunter's company.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...whistleblower/
Are you sure you want to see ALL the evidence, Jimmy?Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostJim, they took hours and hours and hours and HOURS to repeat the same stuff over and over.... They had as much time as they wanted to put their case together in the House, but they were bang-whiz in SUCH A HURRY because it was so important it couldn't wait ----- then Nancy made them wait ----- then they presented a half-baked case for hours and hours and hours and HOURS....
It's like turning in your theme paper to the professor and telling him "I rushed like a mad man to get this finished, then stuck it in my dresser for a month, but never quite got it finished, so.... can YOU please complete it for me before grading it"?
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostI did, along with the entire response, which was extremely weak. As Schiff assumed it would be, it was mostly a false complaint about process. I'll tell you what else they did, they made the defense case for them when it comes to allowing witnesses and documentary evidence into the trial. Did you glean that?
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostIf you had watched the prosecution present it's case in full,....The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Christian3 View PostI think there is something wrong with your TV, Jim. The Dem's case is toast.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Ronson, Today, 08:45 AM
|
5 responses
48 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Ronson
Today, 03:01 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, 05-03-2024, 01:19 PM
|
26 responses
205 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
Today, 03:06 PM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 05-03-2024, 12:23 PM
|
100 responses
419 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cow Poke
Today, 07:45 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, 05-03-2024, 11:46 AM
|
21 responses
138 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Yesterday, 06:52 AM
|
||
Started by seer, 05-03-2024, 04:37 AM
|
23 responses
115 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
05-03-2024, 02:49 PM
|
Comment