The Ukraine scandal timeline Democrats... don�t want America to see

[Mountain Man]

Looks more like confirmation bias to me.

[oxmixmudd]

Might I suggest you take another look at your signature, Jim? You're doing that thing again.

Besides, that's a dishonest representation of my beliefs -- you're better than this. Or, were at one time.

Not really CP. This is a post that support trump and demeans those that believe he has acted inappropriately or illegally, which is typical for you. And this article is in line with theories and ideas promoted by Putin and then by Trump that - as I indicated - have been flagged as Russian sources of disinformation by those most qualified to know. So I'm responding to that post and the fact you've posted disinformation without any critical or objective comment that interferes with its function as disinformation.

[firstfloor]

Looks more like confirmation bias to me.

[Mountain Man]

That's not what Republicans are saying at all.

[seanD]

Not really CP. This is a post that support trump and demeans those that believe he has acted inappropriately or illegally, which is typical for you. And this article is in line with theories and ideas promoted by Putin and then by Trump that - as I indicated - have been flagged as Russian sources of disinformation by those most qualified to know. So I'm responding to that post and the fact you've posted disinformation without any critical or objective comment that interferes with its function as disinformation.

Does "those qualified to know" mean those that pushed a Russiagate conspiracy theory about the potus for three years, and are currently pushing one about Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard?

[firstfloor]

That's not what Republicans are saying at all.

[rogue06]

Don't pay too much attention to the fact that you're lacking in hard evidence, right? And don't look behind the curtain at all the exculpatory evidence -- that'd just confuse people.

[demi-conservative]

That is garbage. Check your facts. THIS IS RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION TO MOVE THE BLAME FOR ELECTION MEDDLING OFF THEM. It is disgraceful that Republicans are running with this.

Is this your usual trolling, or have you finally succumbed to TDS?

[firstfloor]

Don't pay too much attention to the fact that you're lacking in hard evidence, right? And don't look behind the curtain at all the exculpatory evidence -- that'd just confuse people.

[demi-conservative]

but there is no doubt at all in my Fake News-brainwashed mind that he was running a scheme to obtain information that he expected would damage a political opponent

Fixed.

[demi-conservative]

Like I said, where's there's smoke there's fire.

The other telltale sign is insisting that the theory is debunked when it's not, whether it's about John Solomon's credibility, or that a known actor waving a gun about a pizza outlet debunks a certain theory.

[seanD]

The other telltale sign is insisting that the theory is debunked when it's not, whether it's about John Solomon's credibility, or that a known actor waving a gun about a pizza outlet debunks a certain theory.

Insisting it's been debunked. Calling it a conspiracy theory. Calling it Russian disinfo propaganda. Claiming Solomon is a discredited journalist. Threatening that Graham will "regret" the investigation. I've never seen so much smoke related to one subject that has yet to be investigated.

[firstfloor]

Insisting it's been debunked. Calling it a conspiracy theory. Calling it Russian disinfo propaganda. Claiming Solomon is a discredited journalist. Threatening that Graham will "regret" the investigation. I've never seen so much smoke related to one subject that has yet to be investigated.

[demi-conservative]

Insisting it's been debunked. Calling it a conspiracy theory. Calling it Russian disinfo propaganda. Claiming Solomon is a discredited journalist. Threatening that Graham will "regret" the investigation. I've never seen so much smoke related to one subject that has yet to be investigated.

Or implying that there is a eyewitness whistleblower, which rapidly degenerated to 'believe their hearsay!!!!'. We don't have the time or care enough to look into all the documents or alleged evidence, but only one side stinks to high heaven.

Threatening that Graham will "regret" the investigation.

So much screaming, it is only likely to mean that Trump is over the target and might actually drain part of the Swamp.

[Cow Poke]

Not really CP. This is a post that support trump and demeans those that believe he has acted inappropriately or illegally, which is typical for you.

I posted an article, Jim, with very little commentary on my part to see how whoever would respond. The TrumpHaters will respond one way - usually quite reactionary (like you) - while the conservatives will most likely support it. I like to see the reactions. I like to see the reasoning behind the attacks / defenses.

And this article is in line with theories and ideas promoted by Putin and then by Trump that - as I indicated - have been flagged as Russian sources of disinformation by those most qualified to know. So I'm responding to that post and the fact you've posted disinformation without any critical or objective comment that interferes with its function as disinformation.

I don't think we know the entirety of this thing yet. I don't think you know half of what you think you know. But this I know -- you will see it in whatever light makes Trump look the absolute worst.