Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked in 10 Years.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by oxmixmudd View Post
    MM - no they have not. They have risen .6 degrees C since 1990. There was a bit of a slow down 2003 to 2010, but research on that phenomenon shows it was cause by a transfer of heat to the oceans. Which is just part of who warming proceeds. It is back to fairly steep growth since then.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]39868[/ATTACH]

    I'm not going to make any comments about why I think you prefer to listen to 'tobacco science' over real science, but the bold/italic statement or yours above is quite simply false, and further this is not any sort of warming that can be relegated to any 'natural' warming seen in the past.

    Jim
    "Adjusted" data.
    Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
    But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
    Than a fool in the eyes of God


    From "Fools Gold" by Petra

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
      "Adjusted" data.
      You claim even the raw data at the weather stations have been tampered with, which is a rather far reaching conspiracy theory. Beyond that data that has been gathered is available, and the "hockey stick" has been replicated independently from many different data sets.
      Last edited by Leonhard; 09-23-2019, 03:17 PM.

      Comment


      • #48
        Link to raw data for GHCN v3:
        ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/v3/

        Link to raw data for GHCN v4:
        ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/v4/

        You'll find that the raw data sets have been published along with the computer programs that generate the adjusted data. The adjustments are open-source, well documented, and none of it is hand-tuned, but is all based on a simple set of algorithms that filters the results based on consistency checks, and the grids the results.

        Its right there available for your browsing.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Sparko View Post
          ...says an article from 1989.



          THIS is why people keep scoffing at the politicians regarding global warming, or climate change as they call it now.


          It might be real, but they have been blowing it out of proportion and playing Chicken Little for over 30 years now.
          "And false prophets shall arise and deceive many."

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Leonhard View Post
            You claim even the raw data at the weather stations have been tampered with...
            Rather, we don't have access to the raw data, including the historical record. What we have is the "adjusted" data that has been manipulated to fit the hypothesis.
            Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
            But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
            Than a fool in the eyes of God


            From "Fools Gold" by Petra

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
              Rather, we don't have access to the raw data, including the historical record. What we have is the "adjusted" data that has been manipulated to fit the hypothesis.
              You do have access to the raw data, including the historical data. You can contact any of the weather stations, any of the archives and gain access to copies of it yourself. None of it is missing. You can request the tree ring data, the ice core data, the buoey temperature records, the 1800's ship thermometer logs of english vessels. Its right there.

              The data used in the GHCN is also openly available. Along with the programs, both for the version 3 and the version 4 software.

              Here, again:

              ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/v3/


              Here if you want the link directly (warning - its a rather large file):

              ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghc...awghcnd.tar.gz

              Here's the source code for software used, and a readme on how to use it:

              ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/v3/software/52i/

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Leonhard View Post
                Link to raw data for GHCN v3:
                ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/v3/

                Link to raw data for GHCN v4:
                ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/v4/

                You'll find that the raw data sets have been published along with the computer programs that generate the adjusted data. The adjustments are open-source, well documented, and none of it is hand-tuned, but is all based on a simple set of algorithms that filters the results based on consistency checks, and the grids the results.

                Its right there available for your browsing.
                They call it "raw data", but it's really adjusted data, as explained here:

                https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/...-at-ushcngiss/
                https://realclimatescience.com/2019/...perature-data/

                And it's not just US agencies:

                https://www.dailywire.com/news/19211...her-john-nolte

                The tricky part is that you would never know about these changes unless you happened to save an old copy of the "raw" data.

                If the science was really "settled", then why are certain organizations going to such lengths to hide what the science actually says? As the saying goes, Science doesn't lie, but scientists do!
                Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
                But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
                Than a fool in the eyes of God


                From "Fools Gold" by Petra

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                  They call it "raw data", but it's really adjusted data, as explained here: https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/...-at-ushcngiss/
                  Mountain Man, in this article it specifically talks about the "adjusted" data, not the raw data. I don't mind you posting several links, but I at least expect them to be about the subject. The author does ambiguite a lot between whether he's talking about the adjusted or the raw data in this case.

                  This one is also about adjusted data, not the unadjusted raw data.

                  The same problem replicates itself here. This one talks almost exclusive about comparisons between adjusted results.

                  It does however have one instance of comparing the V2 raw data set with the V3 raw data set. And apparently the author doesn't like Reykjavik data set now shows lower past temperatures. There's not much of a dive from the author on this question. No archives are consulted, no one is asked about the reasons for this, which something I've always wondered about Watts Up With That.

                  Thanks for showing me this instance, I'll fire off some questions for some climatologists I know, see if they know the reasons for this update.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    How come AOC's 12 year destruction-of-the-world coincides with the UN's prediction of 2030? And how come this 2030 prediction also matches the UN's goal of having borderless nations and open migration by 2030? Why should anyone being listening to these purveyors of fear? God has not given us a spirit of fear. But, when you take the true God out of the picture, people have nothing else but fear.

                    Why do we have any interest in what the UN wants? They are a godless organization which has no legal authority over us.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by mikewhitney View Post
                      How come AOC's 12 year destruction-of-the-world coincides with the UN's prediction of 2030? And how come this 2030 prediction also matches the UN's goal of having borderless nations and open migration by 2030?
                      Clearly an Illuminati cabal of Shapeshifting Lizard People working together with the Greyz and Israel.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Leonhard View Post
                        Clearly an Illuminati cabal of Shapeshifting Lizard People working together with the Greyz and Israel.
                        I don't think there is much we can do for you if you are focused on interpreting the UN documents in these terms.

                        If you love the UN plan for 'sustainable development', please create a thread telling us what you like about the plan and why nothing in it is a threat to having a decent life free of government confiscation.
                        Last edited by mikewhitney; 09-23-2019, 05:15 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Charles View Post
                          Who are "they"? How many people are we talking about and are "they" the same persons today as over 30 years back? If "It might be real" perhaps it is a rather bad idea to dismiss what is said today because of what was said 30 years ago...
                          It 'might have been real' thirty years ago - and wasn't. It's perfectly fair to point out that picking a guy for clean up when he literally hasn't ever hit a ball is probably a bad plan. Sure, he might finally get lucky, but his batting average doesn't inspire confidence.
                          "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." - Jim Elliot

                          "Forgiveness is the way of love." Gary Chapman

                          My Personal Blog

                          My Novella blog (Current Novella Begins on 7/25/14)

                          Quill Sword

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Charles View Post
                            It seems I obviously was not.
                            Moderated By: RumTumTugger

                            Charles you were asked to leave the thread by the thread starter. This is your official notice that you need to stop posting here. anything you post after this notice will be deleted

                            ***If you wish to take issue with this notice DO NOT do so in this thread.***
                            Contact the forum moderator or an administrator in Private Message or email instead. If you feel you must publicly complain or whine, please take it to the Padded Room unless told otherwise.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by seer View Post
                              It is a shame, they are scaring the crap out of these kids. It reminds me of the duck and cover drills from the 60s.
                              She's the latest David Hogg all wound up with hysteria and let loose while the MSM heaps praise and adoration upon her until she's served her purpose and then is unceremoniously discarded.

                              For instance substitute anchor Margaret Brennan on CBS Evening News gushed about how Thunberg supposedly "stared down" Trump after she threw her temper tantrum at the U.N. but it is obvious that all she did was make faces at his back.


                              ^^Click to Play^^

                              Some "stare down." Pretty much what you'd expect from a spoiled petulant brat.

                              00000000000000ab000-00aab.jpg 00000000000000ab000-00aab3.jpg
                              She looks like she really, really could use a Snickers bar.


                              I generally don't give a rat's hindquarters what various celebrities have to opine but cartoonist Scott Adams had some pertinent things to say about using poorly informed children to push agendas and I want to give him the credit:

                              Children don't have independent opinions about 'Climate Change'. What they know about it is so small that you could not interpret anything they say about it to be anything like an opinion.

                              Somehow we've manage to weaponize the dumbest people in society--and I say that with love. We were all children. We're all smarter now. Wouldn't you rather have the decision made by the smart people? I mean...if you have the choice, and I think we do. I would even go so far as to say that children do not have opinions on 'Climate Change'.

                              They don't have opinions. Children do not read the news and formulate opinions. Opinions are assigned to children. Am I wrong?

                              What they have is not an opinion. They have anxiety. Who gave them the anxiety? Their teachers...maybe their parents. Maybe some of them watch the news but I kind-of doubt it. How many of those kids do you think watch the news? Five percent tops.

                              So, children are all getting all worked-up by adults. Could their be a more unproductive situation than adults making children scared to death and then putting them in charge? Because that feels like what happened.


                              Last edited by rogue06; 09-25-2019, 04:18 AM.

                              I'm always still in trouble again

                              "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                              "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                              "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
                                She's the latest David Hogg all wound up with hysteria and let loose while the MSM heaps praise and adoration upon her until she's served her purpose and then is unceremoniously discarded.

                                For instance substitute anchor Margaret Brennan on CBS Evening News gushed about how Thunberg supposedly "stared down" Trump after she threw her temper tantrum at the U.N. but it is obvious that all she did was make faces at his back.


                                ^^Click to Play^^

                                Some "stare down." Pretty much what you'd expect from a spoiled petulant brat.

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]39901[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]39902[/ATTACH]
                                She looks like she really, really could use a Snickers bar.


                                I generally don't give a rat's hindquarters what various celebrities have to opine but cartoonist Scott Adams had some pertinent things to say about using poorly informed children to push agendas and I want to give him the credit:

                                Children don't have independent opinions about 'Climate Change'. What they know about it is so small that you could not interpret anything they say about it to be anything like an opinion.

                                Somehow we've manage to weaponize the dumbest people in society--and I say that with love. We were all children. We're all smarter now. Wouldn't you rather have the decision made by the smart people? I mean...if you have the choice, and I think we do. I would even go so far as to say that children do not have opinions on 'Climate Change'.

                                They don't have opinions. Children do not read the news and formulate opinions. Opinions are assigned to children. Am I wrong?

                                What they have is not an opinion. They have anxiety. Who gave them the anxiety? Their teachers...maybe their parents. Maybe some of them watch the news but I kind-of doubt it. How many of those kids do you think watch the news? Five percent tops.

                                So, children are all getting all worked-up by adults. Could their be a more unproductive situation than adults making children scared to death and then putting them in charge? Because that feels like what happened.


                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]39903[/ATTACH]
                                And if you wonder where she gets it from, here are some pix of her and her parents all wearing pro-antifa shirts.


                                I'm always still in trouble again

                                "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                                "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                                "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                                Comment

                                Related Threads

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by seer, Yesterday, 04:57 PM
                                7 responses
                                41 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post seer
                                by seer
                                 
                                Started by seer, Yesterday, 02:54 PM
                                0 responses
                                27 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Juvenal
                                by Juvenal
                                 
                                Started by whag, Yesterday, 11:16 AM
                                17 responses
                                107 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post whag
                                by whag
                                 
                                Started by whag, Yesterday, 03:21 AM
                                54 responses
                                292 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post NorrinRadd  
                                Started by seer, 06-05-2024, 03:15 PM
                                53 responses
                                244 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Ronson
                                by Ronson
                                 
                                Working...
                                X