Originally posted by Teallaura
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Another Racist Tweet?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Teallaura View PostThe North - which they did. Armies of the period still provisioned off the land - a euphemism for stealing food from whomever they could.
Northern armies requisitioned houses and everything else. They burned what they couldn't take.
But that was war. Everyone knew what happened when wars were fought.
Reconstruction was a 10 year occupation - and it wasn't much better than the war itself.
You've never read To Kill a Mockingbird or seen Gone with the Wind, have you?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Teallaura View PostJefferson Davis had the same problem Lincoln did - most people weren't willing to fight to either free or keep slaves - making it REALLY difficult to field armies on that basis.
Multiple Southern states had counties secede from them - most of Northern Alabama considered it since none of them really grew cotton or had slaves. Winston County actually seceded.
So Davis argued states rights and Lincoln argued preserving the Union - until the fighting really started and winning became do or die.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostLet's take a look at what she actually said rather than your, um, "paraphrase":
Now I can see why you didn't quote her. It wouldn't support your claim. Not even close to it. So you concocted your own twisted version of it instead. Naughty boy.
She never said it was a sudden rise. This again is your own twisted version. She said that you didn't see Republican membership start to substantially increase until well after the Civil Rights era and that it took place mainly in the 80s and 90s (over two decades).
Don't you have what it takes to counter what she says? Is this why you keep fabricating straw man arguments to battle with?
Um, look at what I what you said that I was responding to Since you are revealing an ability at reading comprehension akin to someone in a coma I highlighted the pertinent part for you. The Dixiecrats came from the Democrats not Republicans (note they aren't called Dixiecans) and returned to the Democrats -- including the very few like Thurmond who would later switch parties.
Technically I'm a "carpetbagger" having been born in Minnesota and lived in Michigan before spending the rest of my life (50+ years south of the Mason-Dixon line). Most of my early schooling (Elementary up into Junior High) was done right outside of Washington D.C. where the end all and be all was the federal government (when we learned to diagram a sentence it was usually from the Constitution or Declaration of Independence; when we got a word problem in math it was about appropriations, revenue and taxes).
Now, in the real world, it was the Democrats that led the record 74 day long Senate filibuster in opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Included among the organizers of the filibuster were several prominent and well-known Democrat standard-bearers including Robert Byrd (Senate Majority Leader, President pro tempore of the Senate[1][2]1. Third in the line of succession to the presidency behind the Vice President and Speaker of the House
2. In a speech on civil rights Al Gore claimed that,
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View Post...The rest of your long winded post isn't worth wasting my time on.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostTranslation: Don't confuse me with the facts!
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostNo it means that the gist of his post was defeated.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostHey rogue, ya know how many southern republicans, whether in the House or the Senate voted for the CRA or the VRA in 64 and 65, I believe it was a great big 0. Nough said! The rest of your long winded post isn't worth wasting my time on.Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostNo it means that the gist of his post was defeated. Southern republicans didn't support the civil rights act and the voting rights act and neither did republican Barry Goldwater who the south then voted for president. The south was basically run by white supremacists and they slowly abandoned the democratic party and their civil rights agenda from 1948 on through to the 60's.Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
Originally posted by One Bad Pig View PostI'm going to guess that, since rogue actually reads the posts in this thread, he's aware of that already. Can you be any more lazy?
Comment
-
Originally posted by One Bad Pig View PostNeither did Southern Democrats, genius. Teallaura (who actually lives in the deep South) has repeatedly corrected you on your erroneous timeline on when the South abandoned the Democratic party.
BET Founder: Democratic Party Has Moved "Too Far To The Left"
BET.jpg
The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostWell if you read this thread then you'd know that rogue made a point of how it was republicans that supported the CRA and the VRA, but what he failed to mention was that southern republicans, all, every last one of them, voted against the democrat sponsered legislation.
And that was the final straw for the white supremacist democrat party in the south. They were still white supremacists, but they began voting republican.Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
Originally posted by One Bad Pig View PostNeither did Southern Democrats, genius. Teallaura (who actually lives in the deep South) has repeatedly corrected you on your erroneous timeline on when the South abandoned the Democratic party.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostAnd who was threatening to take away their possessions?Originally posted by JimL View PostYeah, that was war, Tea. But war isn't what we were talking about, we were talking about what the reason for the war was in the first place. The reason for the war, from the souths perspective, was to maintain slavery, not to stop northern armies from taking their stuff."He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." - Jim Elliot
"Forgiveness is the way of love." Gary Chapman
My Personal Blog
My Novella blog (Current Novella Begins on 7/25/14)
Quill Sword
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Ronson, Today, 08:45 AM
|
5 responses
49 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Ronson
Today, 03:01 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, 05-03-2024, 01:19 PM
|
26 responses
205 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
Today, 03:06 PM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 05-03-2024, 12:23 PM
|
100 responses
421 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cow Poke
Today, 07:45 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, 05-03-2024, 11:46 AM
|
21 responses
138 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Yesterday, 06:52 AM
|
||
Started by seer, 05-03-2024, 04:37 AM
|
23 responses
115 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
05-03-2024, 02:49 PM
|
Comment