Originally posted by Roy
View Post
"How is being a civillian inherently more worthy of protection than being a soldier? Wars aren't personal disputes between individual soldiers, they are massive disputes between groups of people, some performing different functions but all of them contributing to the war machine."
Pregnant women are included in both "civilian" and "groups of people", therefore not worthy of more protection that soldiers. He's OK with killing civilians, including pregnant women and hence their foetuses.
Do you have the cojones to admit this?
Do you have the cojones to admit that drone strikes are not "combat situations"?
I doubt it.
Comment