Originally posted by Sparko
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
So what is this toxic masculinity thing anyhow?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostIs this one of those kiddie things? "Because why?"
You suck at debating JimL.
You are defending pedophilia as normal. You realize that right? How sick are you?The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostI am starting to worry about him.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostStarting?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostWhen he did the NAMBLA thing I just figured he was bad at arguing and had no clue what he was doing. But now he is doing it again, defending pedophilia, and I am starting to worry about him. Either he is sick, or he is so stupid he doesn't realize what he is doing.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostI think it's a case - just like Tassman - where, no matter what we're FOR, he's against, and no matter what we're AGAINST, he's for. Kinda like some of our Twebbers do with Trump. When you're driven by hate, you make really dumb choices and arguments.
So if we say that God doesn't exist, will JimL suddenly argue that he does?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostThat's just like the democrats and Trump. He only has to be for something in order for them to suddenly be against it, even when they were for it before. Like the sanctuary cities.
So if we say that God doesn't exist, will JimL suddenly argue that he does?
But, yeah - all those liberals who were FOR the wall before Trump was, so now they have to be against that, AND border security!The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Postand anyone who has desires to have sex with children would be at risk of acting upon them, making them ALL mentally ill. So your claim that not all pedophiles are mentally ill is useless.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostBy this standard anyone desiring to have sex with beautiful women would be at risk of acting upon them, which is demonstrable nonsense. Most of us control our urges. If and when we feel unable then this is the time to recognize that we are mentally ill and seek professional help.
Make up your mind Tassman.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostIs this one of those kiddie things? "Because why?"
You suck at debating JimL.
You are defending pedophilia as normal. You realize that right? How sick are you?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostYou were the one claiming someone who desired to have sex with children was at risk of acting on it so they would have a mental illness. Now you are saying you were wrong? That my initial example was correct after all?Last edited by Tassman; 05-11-2019, 02:59 AM.
Comment
-
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by eider, Today, 12:12 AM
|
0 responses
23 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by eider
Today, 12:12 AM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 12:53 PM
|
0 responses
119 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sam
Yesterday, 01:07 PM
|
||
Started by Diogenes, 06-14-2024, 08:57 PM
|
56 responses
237 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seer
Today, 09:17 AM
|
||
Started by carpedm9587, 06-14-2024, 11:25 AM
|
51 responses
270 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seer
Today, 09:30 AM
|
||
Started by seer, 06-14-2024, 10:38 AM
|
14 responses
73 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seer
06-14-2024, 03:43 PM
|
Comment